Comments

You must log in or register to comment.

phur10us t1_iy8uzbx wrote

"Elon-gated" . . . I see what you did there . . .

4

ImageCreator t1_iy8w36l wrote

Cramer isn't specifically saying Apple will surge. That phrase is fairly vague. He could be saying that Elon was wrong in his criticism because that's mean.

16

maxx-powerz t1_iy8wm0l wrote

Does anyone think Elon is aiming for Twitter to enter into payment processing w/ crypto being the main currency? Possibly his favorite memecoin Doge?

−4

HarrisLam t1_iy8wyjy wrote

This is hella confusing when Cramer joins the equation. I would probably sit out of this one if I were you pal.

200

Conscious-Soil9055 t1_iy8y6pe wrote

Sounds like Cramer has inside sources from Apple that others do not have. Sounds like a clear case of insider trading to me.

−3

FarrisAT t1_iy908fu wrote

Fuck if Cramer kills AAPL the whole market will die

287

bored_in_NE t1_iy91vwh wrote

Elon wants people to be able to sell items right on twitter without paying Apple 30% fee which is not going to happen. He probably thinking if he throws enough temper tantrums it will change or something and he will find out that it is not going to happen.

4

kad202 t1_iy94e5h wrote

Now I’m convince to buy puts on Apple.

Tim Cook actual name is Tim Crook all along

2

Mnerdy t1_iy953i8 wrote

Definitely good πŸ’° πŸ’Ό !

1

TastyToad t1_iy95oji wrote

If you watch the clip, Cramer is being asked about Elon calling Apples' 30% appstore cut "a hidden tax". He dodges the question and chooses to rant about Elon being "as wrong as you can be", "your best quality people coming from apple" (meaning most valuable users from advertising standpoint) etc.

In other words, he's just blowing hot air, as always.

In reality, both TSLA and APPL puts will print in the incoming months. Elon will likely have to sell more stock, to finance Twitter idiocy. On top of that both companies will suffer due to recession and China problems.

edit: Too regarded to write proper sentences on first try.

22

OffByOneErrorz t1_iy96ub4 wrote

On the one hand AAPL needs Twitter like the desert needs sand. On the other hand inverse Cramer.

Sweaty guy with two buttons

59

krishone t1_iy970su wrote

There goes AAPL TO $50

2

NoobInvester018 t1_iy9ahoc wrote

Finally a worthy match, Jim Crammer's infamous kiss of death or Apple's monolithic economic/political might. Who will win?

71

WTD_Ducks21 t1_iy9dq1i wrote

Can mods ban "inverse cramer" memes next? God this shit is so played out.

6

mogboard t1_iy9ho6f wrote

RemindME! One Week "Are they broke or rich?"

1

buzzhavoc t1_iy9jnfn wrote

For once Elon is being such an idiot that even Cramer might be right.

12

Supra1JZed t1_iy9jy7m wrote

100%. Some are stuck due to the insane predatory model they have. Others are clueless or blindly denying how far behind Apple is.

To be fair to a point, Apple is 1 Vs. World. They've set themselves apart and the entire world collectively is growing. They can only copy as even Apple doesn't have the money for the level of R&D the rest of the world has collectively. It's why Android has been so far ahead for so long. There's thousands of companies in that market developing.

−9

rkkaz t1_iy9q2b7 wrote

"elongated" lmao..

1

Meekzyz t1_iy9s1zn wrote

Im confused. Is he wrong about the slave labor/riots going on. Or just wrong for not censoring it all

1

infamouscrypto8 t1_iy9sqwy wrote

Cramer is a clown and a mainstream media tool. Guy can’t or won’t tell the truth.

2

CC7015 t1_iy9tphk wrote

Elon is just stirring shit up all over to make twitter the place to see the shit show ,

he will come back , say "Twitter is more used (by humans) than ever before" see how good I am , and then try and tuck it under the Halo mission distraction "free speech" in this case (human survival with space x and the mars mirage) (Tesla save the planet mirage)

Good enough marketing plan for me from the Elon playbook

1

downboat t1_iy9ycik wrote

Tesla Phone to the moon

0

Datum_Dude t1_iya0qca wrote

I vote to make "Elongated Puts" a WSB everyday term. I also advocate for the regular challenge to WSBetters to ask "are you elongated?" or "how elongated are you?" and to totally normalize a massive "reeeeeee" rip as an answer.

0

drkaos_69 t1_iya2ubi wrote

Oh yeah, it’s put time I just went full regard

1

Dark_Tint t1_iya68tq wrote

Apple will now collapse due to the Cramer rule

1

CarwashTendies t1_iya6wbu wrote

AAPL at $150 is fine!! Do not sell AAPL! They’re fine!!!

−1

josed2144 t1_iya812u wrote

YES!!!! It’s money timeπŸ™

1

brainfoggedfrog t1_iyab1jy wrote

Lol cramer reminds me of that fat guy from the movie a bronx tale

1

GuhgaChad t1_iyabt2c wrote

Guh Cramer strikes again

1

curtdept t1_iyadqug wrote

Damn Musk was right... Confirmed.

−1

BlurredSight t1_iyaeij1 wrote

Yeah the basic WSB equation was two variables, Player * Symbol ^ -1 = Option.

Now we have (Player * Symbol ^ -1)*Player^-1 = Option * Inverse Player = Final Option.

The only difference being when adding weightings onto the variables, Jim Cramer inverse outweighs Elon Musk. But Elon's ability to go super regard on a moments notice makes the equation dynamic depending on the time of day and other outside factors.

4

Brayum_ t1_iyal033 wrote

So what kind of long puts do I need to get? Any suggestions for this re re

1

MrULTRALONG t1_iyalvbj wrote

So basically Elon is right? (Reverse jim creampie model)

0

EmperorPedro2 t1_iyaqvk9 wrote

Apple Vs Cramer: Immortal stock Vs accidentally reliable Prophet of Doom

0

Harucifer t1_iyarxvo wrote

Regarded AAPL fan boys vs Regarded Elon fan boys, both travelling in opposite directions at 80 mph...

0

cletus_ t1_iyb0v8t wrote

Cramer makes $AAPL the new $GTW. Thanks a lot fuck fingers.

1

NamelessGlory t1_iyb3a5x wrote

Apple are for dumb consumers who just want surface level software, living in the walled garden (restriction prison) where you can only do things "inside the lines" drawn by apple.

16

Clapeyron1776 t1_iyb5m2z wrote

Does it still count if Kramer is wrong for the wrong reason? AAPL stink with go done but it doesn’t have anything to do with Musk’s Twitter which is socially irrelevant now other than comic relief. AAPL will go down because China can’t make iPhones right now

1

azhiazthesky t1_iyb8dm8 wrote

Alright nut huggers, the inverse isn’t 100%.

1

yalogin t1_iyb9co9 wrote

Fuck!! This is a blow on multiple fronts. Apple is the only stock that hasn't killed me this year and I really like my iPhone. This fucker is killing both in one blow.

1

I_drive_dick_magnets t1_iyb9oo0 wrote

As a dumb ape who has owned many iPhones, I can confirm. I just want simple because I am simple. I also look forward to seeing apple nose dive while simultaneously owning stock in them. Am dum fuk ape, i ain’t care.

10

badazzcpa t1_iyba8a4 wrote

On one hand Apple doesn’t need Twitter in the least. On the other if they ban Twitter they may run head first into anti trust - Ma Bell stile. I would imagine Apple ignores Musk and keeps on printing. On a separate note the bru ha ha at Foxcom may turn into a huge headache and create a massive supply chain headache.

1

jdcl00 t1_iybw5mk wrote

If not for Jobs Apple would have rotten today !!

1

Toiletpaperpanic2020 t1_iybxkd5 wrote

"Good morning regards,

I was going going to do a .5 rate hike but you fuckers spent too much on black Friday shopping, proving there is still too much liquidity out there necessitating the need to do another .75 rate hike"

17

boosterish1313 t1_iyc0kgx wrote

Cramer has a really bad BS meter and can’t identify the authentic + real, once in a lifetime entrepreneur (elon) who’s actually delivering real tangible things that have or will change the world versus the total joke and frauds and freaks like Elizabeth Holmes or SBF. Emotional IQ is just off.

1

Odd-Block-2998 t1_iyc1flk wrote

Elon: going crazy

Cramer: he is crazy

It turns out that Elon is right after all. img

1

MisterAlleyCat t1_iyc1mf2 wrote

If we had to choose to have a future with Tesla or Apple, and could only choose one, which do you think the majority would favour?

1

Barachie1 t1_iyc8rgn wrote

I'm an Android user who doesn't touch iOS because of limited file access, weak breadth of available software, and limited customizability. Despite all of that, iPhones do have the best chip hardware on the phone market. That wasn't always the case, but with the M1 chip they do have a real hardware advantage in that area. More generally, if you don't care about specific software and want maximum snappiness and reliability in all situations, iPhones are probably better overall. If you need anything Android has to offer the difference in snappiness/reliability likely isn't enough to matter, but iPhones definitely have a niche/role to play.

4

-gggggggggg- t1_iyc9d6g wrote

This was true a decade ago. Today, every major operating system on any platform is locked down and a walled garden. Windows is basically malware now with its main feature being a vehicle to host its app store and data collection services. Android today is more locked down than iOS 5 years ago. You can still find open source forks of Android, but nobody outside hobbyists uses them.

2

essseker t1_iyc9h3e wrote

Both are going down

1

Barachie1 t1_iycemxr wrote

Oh yeah I'm dumb M1/M2 naming is for laptops. But they do have superior phone processors too certainly with their A- series. Like the M1 for their laptops, the phone CPU line is based on technology Apple owns and developed in-house.

In terms of raw performance they tend to win by a lot too. From Tom's Hardware comparing the Qualcomm (in the latest Samsung) to the iPhone 14 pro maxipad, "On the graphics front, the iPhone 14 Pro Max notched 12,363 or 74 frames per second on the 3DMark Wild Life Unlimited benchmark. The Galaxy S22 Ultra had a score of 9,499 and 56.87 fps.Β 

On our video editing test, which involves transcoding a 4K video to 1080p in the Adobe Premiere Rush app, the iPhone 14 Pro Max averaged 30 seconds. The Galaxy S22 Ultra needed 47 seconds."

iPhones also tend to have the best battery lifetime on the market for comparably powerful devices. Idk if they have super duper low power modes like some Androids though.

1

nyc2bad t1_iychmcj wrote

$aapl, 70% iphone comes from Foxconn....just one put reason

1

Barachie1 t1_iyci1bk wrote

Lol. I'm just picturing this alternate reality where Fidelity, Robinhood, etc force you to pay a 30% commission to Apple if you use the iPhone app on any stock purchases.

1

Barachie1 t1_iycie0p wrote

All absolutely mirages, but Tesla is probably a net positive for the environment. Fossil fuel emissions from cars produce a lot more greenhouse gasses than the electricity used to charge Teslas (even accounting for the fact that much of that electricity comes from fossil fuels as those plants burn it more efficiently and a good chunk is from green energy). Lithium mining sucks, but it is nowhere near as significant as automobile emissions.

Again, Elon is not doing anything he does for the noble goal of saving the planet. He says whatever he wants to market his businesses (or to feed his ego/beg for attention)

1

3d-money t1_iyckjci wrote

Oh no. Fucking cramer img

1

switch495 t1_iyckjfa wrote

This is coming from a man who knows what he's talking about when it comes to 'wrong as you can get'.

1

pvsocialmedia t1_iycm6ve wrote

Cramer for President! He might do what Jpoe hasn't been able to do yet. Kill the market to curb inflation. Edit: I was about to put a /s at the end, but if you can't figure that out.......

1

BeerIsGoodForSoul t1_iyct6dw wrote

On one hand I can inverse Cramer. On the other hand I can inverse WSB. Either way it's going to go down, or it's going to go up, so why not both. I'm cumming with both hands on this one.

1