Submitted by Endoskeleton1 t3_z7ytgm in wallstreetbets
Comments
MeemerPLBoy t1_iy8svns wrote
Big_Biscotti_1259 t1_iy8sy3w wrote
Careful.. Statement is not clear
[deleted] t1_iy8u80s wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_iy8w0we wrote
[deleted]
[deleted] t1_iy8w28j wrote
[deleted]
ImageCreator t1_iy8w36l wrote
Cramer isn't specifically saying Apple will surge. That phrase is fairly vague. He could be saying that Elon was wrong in his criticism because that's mean.
anotherloserhere t1_iy8w9ny wrote
So... Sideways?
maxx-powerz t1_iy8wm0l wrote
Does anyone think Elon is aiming for Twitter to enter into payment processing w/ crypto being the main currency? Possibly his favorite memecoin Doge?
Robincapitalists t1_iy8wqb0 wrote
I'd buy those pooooooots on Tesla.
19Rocket_Jockey76 t1_iy8xkwp wrote
Hrs not your pal. Guy!
Mista9000 t1_iy8xta7 wrote
He's expressly said it in several interviews. Not crypto anything but Twitter as a payment platform.
Conscious-Soil9055 t1_iy8y6pe wrote
Sounds like Cramer has inside sources from Apple that others do not have. Sounds like a clear case of insider trading to me.
1600hazenstreet t1_iy8yite wrote
Inverse Cramer.
Annoying_guest t1_iy90hmi wrote
no need to be like that. Buddy.
ChampChange420 t1_iy90u96 wrote
Easy there friend
bored_in_NE t1_iy91vwh wrote
Elon wants people to be able to sell items right on twitter without paying Apple 30% fee which is not going to happen. He probably thinking if he throws enough temper tantrums it will change or something and he will find out that it is not going to happen.
[deleted] t1_iy94h62 wrote
[removed]
mad_king_soup t1_iy94p5x wrote
you can sell physical items through your app without paying the 30% fee. Literally every shopping app does this
Endoskeleton1 OP t1_iy953td wrote
I'm not your guy. Buddy!
Endoskeleton1 OP t1_iy957xw wrote
Woah there fam!
TastyToad t1_iy95oji wrote
If you watch the clip, Cramer is being asked about Elon calling Apples' 30% appstore cut "a hidden tax". He dodges the question and chooses to rant about Elon being "as wrong as you can be", "your best quality people coming from apple" (meaning most valuable users from advertising standpoint) etc.
In other words, he's just blowing hot air, as always.
In reality, both TSLA and APPL puts will print in the incoming months. Elon will likely have to sell more stock, to finance Twitter idiocy. On top of that both companies will suffer due to recession and China problems.
edit: Too regarded to write proper sentences on first try.
OffByOneErrorz t1_iy96ub4 wrote
On the one hand AAPL needs Twitter like the desert needs sand. On the other hand inverse Cramer.
Sweaty guy with two buttons
MeridianNL t1_iy97cq1 wrote
Watch it there pal!
ChampChange420 t1_iy97nf6 wrote
We already used pal sir
NoobInvester018 t1_iy9ahoc wrote
Finally a worthy match, Jim Crammer's infamous kiss of death or Apple's monolithic economic/political might. Who will win?
iloveuranus t1_iy9ajry wrote
I'm not your buddy, fam.
Supra1JZed t1_iy9ca7n wrote
Well he's not wrong on the advertising logic. That's why they are Apple users, typically. Highly susceptible and influenceable.
VoidTendies t1_iy9ce3x wrote
Whatnot already does just that
Apprehensive_Pin1950 t1_iy9cjlz wrote
Oh Jim, are you ever tired of being wrong?
[deleted] t1_iy9cs20 wrote
[removed]
WTD_Ducks21 t1_iy9dq1i wrote
Can mods ban "inverse cramer" memes next? God this shit is so played out.
Ash0300 t1_iy9dq47 wrote
Mikerk t1_iy9fkok wrote
One thing Apple has proven is that Apple users are easily separated from their money
dabears---318 t1_iy9fzss wrote
jpow would like a word tomorrow. in fact heβs got a whole speech prepared
Endoskeleton1 OP t1_iy9g7s3 wrote
It's still working my boy..Why are you mad at life?
BidenEmails t1_iy9gwql wrote
Are we doing NOK and BB?
[deleted] t1_iy9hquq wrote
[removed]
M1cahSlash t1_iy9i4ze wrote
Iβm not your buddy, man.
M1cahSlash t1_iy9i78x wrote
Iβm not your guy, buddy.
Vegan_Honk t1_iy9ijn1 wrote
chill out homes.
ObamaWhisperer t1_iy9ipn1 wrote
Must have been in a 50x leverage yesterday like me
buzzhavoc t1_iy9jqi2 wrote
It's Holmes, Johnny.
Excellent-External-7 t1_iy9jrba wrote
Elongate deez nutz nerd π°
Supra1JZed t1_iy9jy7m wrote
100%. Some are stuck due to the insane predatory model they have. Others are clueless or blindly denying how far behind Apple is.
To be fair to a point, Apple is 1 Vs. World. They've set themselves apart and the entire world collectively is growing. They can only copy as even Apple doesn't have the money for the level of R&D the rest of the world has collectively. It's why Android has been so far ahead for so long. There's thousands of companies in that market developing.
[deleted] t1_iy9jzd5 wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_iy9khfx wrote
[removed]
SkipperSkupper t1_iy9mafb wrote
Sending regarded regards
elevatorman32 t1_iy9nhze wrote
Easy killa
Andrei2402 t1_iy9q405 wrote
What happens when an unstoppable force meets an immovable object?
CryogenicEngineer t1_iy9q8yu wrote
Cant kill apple because it actually creates items of value.
infamouscrypto8 t1_iy9sqwy wrote
Cramer is a clown and a mainstream media tool. Guy canβt or wonβt tell the truth.
CC7015 t1_iy9tphk wrote
Elon is just stirring shit up all over to make twitter the place to see the shit show ,
he will come back , say "Twitter is more used (by humans) than ever before" see how good I am , and then try and tuck it under the Halo mission distraction "free speech" in this case (human survival with space x and the mars mirage) (Tesla save the planet mirage)
Good enough marketing plan for me from the Elon playbook
oneredflag t1_iy9tufu wrote
The entire consumer market is based on this premise...
Republic8583 t1_iy9tz3h wrote
Apple 80$
[deleted] t1_iy9u35r wrote
[deleted]
jerkITwithRIGHTYnewb t1_iy9y54n wrote
Buying puts on the only tech to survive the slaughter because of something Elon is doing. Smooth brain AF.
GrizzBear57 t1_iy9zl31 wrote
Cramerβs Apple Watch keeps track of how cokeβd out he is before he goes on air
Datum_Dude t1_iya0qca wrote
I vote to make "Elongated Puts" a WSB everyday term. I also advocate for the regular challenge to WSBetters to ask "are you elongated?" or "how elongated are you?" and to totally normalize a massive "reeeeeee" rip as an answer.
BayHarbour-Butcher t1_iya4caz wrote
MSFT/GOOG calls!
jcmonkeyjc t1_iya4t48 wrote
no shit, Sherlock
Endoskeleton1 OP t1_iya6erx wrote
You sir should run for president
CarwashTendies t1_iya6wbu wrote
AAPL at $150 is fine!! Do not sell AAPL! Theyβre fine!!!
jpwhat t1_iyaa5u7 wrote
Invest0rnoob1 t1_iyaaugu wrote
Toots per second
brainfoggedfrog t1_iyab1jy wrote
Lol cramer reminds me of that fat guy from the movie a bronx tale
iriehueu373736373828 t1_iyabvw6 wrote
Good and I just bought calls on apple !!!!
SeliciousSedicious t1_iyae9k7 wrote
I think i found out how the world ends here.
Paradoxal reality ending event detected.
BlurredSight t1_iyaeij1 wrote
Yeah the basic WSB equation was two variables, Player * Symbol ^ -1 = Option.
Now we have (Player * Symbol ^ -1)*Player^-1 = Option * Inverse Player = Final Option.
The only difference being when adding weightings onto the variables, Jim Cramer inverse outweighs Elon Musk. But Elon's ability to go super regard on a moments notice makes the equation dynamic depending on the time of day and other outside factors.
Ravi5ingh t1_iyagv7x wrote
No it makes dildos that ppl shove up their ass screaming : OH SO ROUND AND USER FRIENDLY!!!
adarkuccio t1_iyahp8c wrote
This can legit generate a vacuum decay
MrULTRALONG t1_iyalvbj wrote
So basically Elon is right? (Reverse jim creampie model)
6a21hy1e t1_iyalzej wrote
Musk is tweeting from his iPhone.
CrabFederal t1_iyan19r wrote
Tim Apple?
itsmeagain1969 t1_iyand9n wrote
Ok 'Homer'
itsmeagain1969 t1_iyanuvw wrote
Thought that was only for Friday's? I'm confused!
itsmeagain1969 t1_iyao1v8 wrote
Answer: Cramer & Elon Lose. Apple chuggs!
CrabFederal t1_iyaphmv wrote
Elon is be buying these for the patents
EmperorPedro2 t1_iyaqvk9 wrote
Apple Vs Cramer: Immortal stock Vs accidentally reliable Prophet of Doom
[deleted] t1_iyas172 wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_iyazfcb wrote
[deleted]
[deleted] t1_iyazhjr wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_iyb0dux wrote
[removed]
needyouonthatwall t1_iyb17wh wrote
Heβs not your buddy, chief.
HOIhater1 t1_iyb1efl wrote
The Fed makes an unannounced 2-basis-point rate hike.
NamelessGlory t1_iyb3a5x wrote
Apple are for dumb consumers who just want surface level software, living in the walled garden (restriction prison) where you can only do things "inside the lines" drawn by apple.
NamelessGlory t1_iyb3hkk wrote
He got touched by inverse Cramer, now he has trauma πππ
Fangore t1_iyb3sq2 wrote
He's not your buddy, friend.
Clapeyron1776 t1_iyb5m2z wrote
Does it still count if Kramer is wrong for the wrong reason? AAPL stink with go done but it doesnβt have anything to do with Muskβs Twitter which is socially irrelevant now other than comic relief. AAPL will go down because China canβt make iPhones right now
azhiazthesky t1_iyb8dm8 wrote
Alright nut huggers, the inverse isnβt 100%.
I_drive_dick_magnets t1_iyb9f4n wrote
This is the way.
I_drive_dick_magnets t1_iyb9oo0 wrote
As a dumb ape who has owned many iPhones, I can confirm. I just want simple because I am simple. I also look forward to seeing apple nose dive while simultaneously owning stock in them. Am dum fuk ape, i ainβt care.
badazzcpa t1_iyba8a4 wrote
On one hand Apple doesnβt need Twitter in the least. On the other if they ban Twitter they may run head first into anti trust - Ma Bell stile. I would imagine Apple ignores Musk and keeps on printing. On a separate note the bru ha ha at Foxcom may turn into a huge headache and create a massive supply chain headache.
chev327fox t1_iybbydo wrote
Youβre describing most of the market.
Annoying_guest t1_iybcck4 wrote
hey there shipmate I aint yer chief
[deleted] t1_iybfhva wrote
[deleted]
[deleted] t1_iybg8qz wrote
Haywood_jablowmeeee t1_iybgipn wrote
Elon says AAPL is bad. Cramer says AAPL is good. But Elon has gone full Cramer the last year so that means itβs a double good vote which means bet for double bad????
backruptcyfomo t1_iybh7jx wrote
Jim Crater predicted market crash?
BraveFencerMusashi t1_iybhfez wrote
Theta gang rubbing their hands
zephyy t1_iybtumh wrote
Capitalism is based on this premise.
DirtyJimCramer t1_iybv0la wrote
Fuck you
CryogenicEngineer t1_iybwaym wrote
Seethe at the popularity of user friendly UI. Lol
*Typed on iphone
JoseArcadi0 t1_iybwlsp wrote
Thatβs the signal
Toiletpaperpanic2020 t1_iybxkd5 wrote
"Good morning regards,
I was going going to do a .5 rate hike but you fuckers spent too much on black Friday shopping, proving there is still too much liquidity out there necessitating the need to do another .75 rate hike"
Ravi5ingh t1_iyc029i wrote
Exactly and it's so frustrating
Ravi5ingh t1_iyc041d wrote
The concept of user friendliness is one if the greatest misconceptions of UI design
DidNotRedditMan t1_iyc0atz wrote
Cramer just destroyed my pension. Thanks Jimmy.
boosterish1313 t1_iyc0kgx wrote
Cramer has a really bad BS meter and canβt identify the authentic + real, once in a lifetime entrepreneur (elon) whoβs actually delivering real tangible things that have or will change the world versus the total joke and frauds and freaks like Elizabeth Holmes or SBF. Emotional IQ is just off.
[deleted] t1_iyc0zqk wrote
[removed]
Odd-Block-2998 t1_iyc1flk wrote
Elon: going crazy
Cramer: he is crazy
It turns out that Elon is right after all.
MisterAlleyCat t1_iyc1mf2 wrote
If we had to choose to have a future with Tesla or Apple, and could only choose one, which do you think the majority would favour?
[deleted] t1_iyc6m3k wrote
Barachie1 t1_iyc8rgn wrote
I'm an Android user who doesn't touch iOS because of limited file access, weak breadth of available software, and limited customizability. Despite all of that, iPhones do have the best chip hardware on the phone market. That wasn't always the case, but with the M1 chip they do have a real hardware advantage in that area. More generally, if you don't care about specific software and want maximum snappiness and reliability in all situations, iPhones are probably better overall. If you need anything Android has to offer the difference in snappiness/reliability likely isn't enough to matter, but iPhones definitely have a niche/role to play.
-gggggggggg- t1_iyc9d6g wrote
This was true a decade ago. Today, every major operating system on any platform is locked down and a walled garden. Windows is basically malware now with its main feature being a vehicle to host its app store and data collection services. Android today is more locked down than iOS 5 years ago. You can still find open source forks of Android, but nobody outside hobbyists uses them.
-gggggggggg- t1_iyc9f8l wrote
iPhones don't use the M1 chip.
vanpenzlovera t1_iycb8l7 wrote
Fuuuuuck puts on apple? noooo
salahanthropistation t1_iyce21u wrote
Barachie1 t1_iycemxr wrote
Oh yeah I'm dumb M1/M2 naming is for laptops. But they do have superior phone processors too certainly with their A- series. Like the M1 for their laptops, the phone CPU line is based on technology Apple owns and developed in-house.
In terms of raw performance they tend to win by a lot too. From Tom's Hardware comparing the Qualcomm (in the latest Samsung) to the iPhone 14 pro maxipad, "On the graphics front, the iPhone 14 Pro Max notched 12,363 or 74 frames per second on the 3DMark Wild Life Unlimited benchmark. The Galaxy S22 Ultra had a score of 9,499 and 56.87 fps.Β
On our video editing test, which involves transcoding a 4K video to 1080p in the Adobe Premiere Rush app, the iPhone 14 Pro Max averaged 30 seconds. The Galaxy S22 Ultra needed 47 seconds."
iPhones also tend to have the best battery lifetime on the market for comparably powerful devices. Idk if they have super duper low power modes like some Androids though.
nyc2bad t1_iychwal wrote
$aapl is plug&play stuff for higher learning humans, priceless over $1500 for phone...fck put reason two
Barachie1 t1_iyci1bk wrote
Lol. I'm just picturing this alternate reality where Fidelity, Robinhood, etc force you to pay a 30% commission to Apple if you use the iPhone app on any stock purchases.
nyc2bad t1_iyci501 wrote
...parts from china @lowcost production, paying for an biten Apple...put that trash
Barachie1 t1_iycie0p wrote
All absolutely mirages, but Tesla is probably a net positive for the environment. Fossil fuel emissions from cars produce a lot more greenhouse gasses than the electricity used to charge Teslas (even accounting for the fact that much of that electricity comes from fossil fuels as those plants burn it more efficiently and a good chunk is from green energy). Lithium mining sucks, but it is nowhere near as significant as automobile emissions.
Again, Elon is not doing anything he does for the noble goal of saving the planet. He says whatever he wants to market his businesses (or to feed his ego/beg for attention)
Cashmoneyboy98 t1_iycjszv wrote
Nah man, Cramer always wins (loses)
pvsocialmedia t1_iycm6ve wrote
Cramer for President! He might do what Jpoe hasn't been able to do yet. Kill the market to curb inflation. Edit: I was about to put a /s at the end, but if you can't figure that out.......
buzzhavoc t1_iyco84g wrote
mannnerlygamer t1_iycpnc7 wrote
I believe you are thinking Lovense granted itβs only a matter of time before apple acquires them
BeerIsGoodForSoul t1_iyct6dw wrote
On one hand I can inverse Cramer. On the other hand I can inverse WSB. Either way it's going to go down, or it's going to go up, so why not both. I'm cumming with both hands on this one.
Confident_Weird3353 t1_iyddhn7 wrote
Take a cheap mans award π₯πͺπ₯πͺ
Confident_Weird3353 t1_iyde8j8 wrote
Whatever you say about Elon, the madman has balls
VisualMod t1_iy8ruy0 wrote
^^WSB ^^Stats ^^Discord ^^BanBets ^^VoteBot ^^FAQ ^^Leaderboard ^^- ^^Keep_VM_Alive