Submitted by G1lg4m3sh t3_z2ais6 in wallstreetbets

With the ongoing twitter fiasko I'm wondering if there is the possibility that Elon will sell (have to sell) more of his Tesla stock. Advertisers pulling out of Twitter, already 50% of the staff fired and another good chunk of the remaining staff not agreeing to Elon's work demands/leaving. All in all if he doesn't turn it around it's not looking good. Or am I missing something here? what do you guys think?

P.S. yea I'm regarded

26

Comments

You must log in or register to comment.

VisualMod t1_ixfdadb wrote

>There is always the possibility that Elon will sell more of his Tesla stock, but it is difficult to say for certain. The current situation with Twitter is certainly not ideal, but it remains to be seen how much impact this will have on Tesla's business. It is possible that advertisers may pull out of Twitter, which could lead to a decline in revenue and profit for the company. However, at this point it is too early to tell what the full extent of the fallout from the twitter fiasko will be.

4

BYE_HI_SELL_LOW t1_ixfeg7m wrote

“No, he’s never going to buy twitter!”

-img

15

theshogun02 t1_ixfeia6 wrote

Yes. Also a bunch in case you were wondering. Honestly it might be best if he finishes killing off Twitter sooner than later, for all the Tesla bagholder’s sakes.

7

G1lg4m3sh OP t1_ixfes5t wrote

I'm honestly wondering what the fuck Elon's thought process was buying this shithole in the first place

15

davescilken t1_ixffbhe wrote

IMO he was half joking and found himself in a horrible position between a bad decision and a crashing equity market, unable to back out, now trying to stay afloat and failing. Something needs to die. I hope it's only twitter.

26

BlueMysteryWolf t1_ixffchg wrote

I'm convinced he wanted to start a fire at the company. He pretty much stated as such with all of his "Radical changes" that he wanted to do.

Imagine when the end result is the consumers/advertisers going "This isn't what we signed up for." and just leaving.

3

Reasonable-Leave7140 t1_ixfgh9s wrote

Have you seen the video of the woman going through her day at Twitter?

"Show up at office 10 AM; get latte; do yoga; one meeting lunch one other meeting; leave 330"

His message was designed to entice them to quit; he's trying to weed out all the slackers like the guy who reportedly after being fired for tweeting curses at Musk was offered a job by Reddit and turned it down because he "likes to rock into the office at 11 AM".

Now, MAYBE Musk means 18 hour days 7 days a week for months on end-- but that's not actually legal to demand people to work, and it seems to me that "9 to 5 with an hour for lunch and generally working not doing yoga" would qualify as "extremely hard core" for the employees.

Twitter will be fine long term; too many people are too addicted to it. It'll go through a rough patch, but it will come out the other end with employees who fit its new culture and in a much better place.

5

LORDB_LordByronPool t1_ixfh64p wrote

Combine $8 per month and cutting so many employees free, I would think he's good for now.

−1

euserc75 t1_ixfhz31 wrote

Tax loss harvesting for the sale of stock he had to make to tax payments earlier this as his shared became vested. Connect the dots …he’s got a whole tax / legal department working for him

1

Karl_Spakler_ t1_ixfkg9z wrote

And on that note….just spitballing here but….doesn’t ford spend like 4 billion a year in advertising? Soooo in like 20 years, would this purchase pay for itself in Tesla, spacex/starlink, boring, etc. adverts alone ?

3

skydiver19 t1_ixfkje2 wrote

He’s got rid of around 90% and good, a lot of them where self entitled lazy f**ks. Bitching they have to pay for lunch, no more free meals. A senior engineer your looking at 250-500k

Making videos showing how lazy and how much of the piss you’re taking, oh 10am here getting my latte, then chilling out catching up, to then a glass of wine on tap and to the roof garden. That’s not a person who’s working 35-40hours, it’s a day out with mates.

Twitter will save an easy 500m to 1b in wages/benefits.

The advertisers will be back when they realise they are losing out to there competitors who are either still on or go back before them. Eapecialy with sales down and Christmas around the corner.

Many revenue streams available moving forward.

And despite it all traffic is up due to all the media attention and the platform is still available.

0

skydiver19 t1_ixfksvz wrote

She took the piss with that video, and shows the culture and how many are just lazy self entitled tw@ts, I would of canned there arses too.

Like you say easy way to shake the tree and get rid of the dead wood and work shy

3

zephyy t1_ixfljzl wrote

Except

A) they have to pay those employees 3 months severance so it's not immediate

B) Twitter will eventually have to hire more people because they're operating on a skeleton crew comprised mostly of people on visas. See https://matthewtejo.substack.com/p/why-twitter-didnt-go-down-from-a for an example of why Twitter hasn't suffered a massive incident yet

c) There is no way they pay $1 billion in payroll alone per year. Their last quarterly General & Administrative was $217 million.

8

_transcendant t1_ixflv0e wrote

absolutely not, i have no idea where this weird narrative that all these employees were lazy and entitled is coming from. there may have been some dead weight, usually is in most organizations, but the scope of the layoffs is absolutely staggering and is complete mismanagement.

12

99_Gretzky t1_ixfojrc wrote

I’m good. I’ll keep my Tesla shares. Very low cost basis. Started with only $2000 invested. I’ve seen $2k wasted in worse ways. A lot can change in 5, 10, 15 years. I’ll ride it out.

6

iluvvivapuffs t1_ixfpins wrote

Becky Quick was in a meeting with him and said, she questioned his decision until she heard him elaborating his plans. She said he put a lot more thoughts into it than people give him credit for.

(Having said that, I do think he didn’t like the price tag and couldn’t back out of the deal)

4

db117117 t1_ixfrf1z wrote

I think it’s jealousy

Like if there’s anyone to blame for over hiring, it’s the CEO and execs

How is any of this the fault of the workers

Even if you’re a sheeple who’s eaten this “narrative” that Twitter workers are evil liberals … the workers are not making content decisions — their bosses are

Taking glee in workers who are just following exec’s orders getting fired is some weird brainwashing

And like… execs actually making these decisions are getting like $20million to $1billion+ pay packages

And you’re blaming workers making less than 1% of that?

12

Adventurous_Wonder21 t1_ixfs8ok wrote

I could see it panning out in like 5-10 years. But for now I don't think it's a good way for tesla to market thier cars. Twitters average user makes under 75k and is under 35, teslas average buyer is older and makes significantly more. It could work long term but that depends on Elon keeping Twitter from blowing up and twitter retaining its users into thier 40s.

This is not financial advice.

Warmest regards

2

CapitTresIII t1_ixft4uh wrote

He is already selling more shares to cover the Twatter operating expenses, yes Twatter, it’s for twats now. He is not laying off people and cutting costs because things are going good!! It’s getting worse and all the new bots created for the BS polls are making it worse. Puts for the win on TSLA!

5

1Litwiller t1_ixg2mgj wrote

I wonder when Tesla and spacex investors will be tired of footing the bill for twitter and start unloading their own shares…

0

Flight-Money t1_ixgbmvz wrote

Elon es looking for something deeper with twitter, he is trying to get energy from humans emotional reactions.

1

asterik-x t1_ixgcktp wrote

Twitter is an excuse. He sells stock because he knows tesla will get a correction sooner or later

1

darkspd96 t1_ixgek52 wrote

No, it will all be ok by tomorrow morning

1

Ok-Confusion-2368 t1_ixggxrf wrote

You think Elon gives a shit about pouring more money into failing twitter by selling TSLA shares? He’ll let Twitter declare bankruptcy before selling off more Tesla shares, would be stupid to do that after just recalling 322K vehicles and SP hitting 2 year low

1

dhdhdjdj2 t1_ixgjtmc wrote

Sounds right. Short Tesla.

0

Jolly_Needleworker_9 t1_ixgqso6 wrote

My unpopular opinion, Twitter will be re-made by him and in few years a new IPO, the share prices will go up in the first few days (Elon will choose a perfect time for the IPO) and he will sell a lot of shares and make up all his loses.

3

turbo_dude t1_ixh79rm wrote

At least the people who paid money up front for the tweets will have to wait until tweet 3.0 is launched - their money is trapped!. Should help with the cashflow. Just need to wait for that new gigatweet to open so the tweets can be produced faster/more cheaply.

Also the greenrocket subsidy from the government will help to shore up the production of tweets.

Also we built a test section of the tweet pipeline (1600 characters) and put some videos of it on youtube.

Also we sold some hats for the tweethole company that allows tweets to be sent underground.

It's fine, all under control.

1

Ok-Maintenance-2738 t1_ixhoi0p wrote

You helmet wearing short bus riding stuttering regards must be the dumbest people alive. Twitter is thriving and having record engagement everyday with record daily profits! Now all of you go ask your wife’s boyfriend for forgiveness for your stupidity.

−1

Calm_Leek_1362 t1_ixi4o8h wrote

They'll lose revenue proportional to their staff cuts. They will see profits for about a year then the staff will be unable to keep up with maintenance or add new features, unless they are already working on replacing all the staff they dismissed.

People don't understand that companies can't just raise their revenue per employee because they laid people off. If they didn't need the staff before, they wouldn't have hired them in the first place.

1

Ok-Confusion-2368 t1_ixir4or wrote

Well….for one, your logic of what somebody does before a major acquisition, which he was legally forced into, doesn’t reflect what he would do now and risk further damage creating more negative sentiment on TSLA, which is significantly more important than now privately owned Twitter. To think he needs to sell off more shares just to fund Twitter projects vs needing major capital to purchase a big company are not one and the same, Learn the difference genius 👍🏽

1

Reasonable-Leave7140 t1_ixiv3hw wrote

That might be the case- except we've already seen, the majority of these employees were effectively NOT doing the work of a full time employee.

They seem to have had something like 10-15, maybe even 20+ people on pay roll for every 40 hours of work.

They can replace a few, be at a far lower staffing level and still turn out more productive work.

1

skydiver19 t1_ixk1n82 wrote

Because them hours are rubbish. Sorry are you jumping to the conclusion of the number of hours? Appose to the time of the day?

I don’t like working all the day light hours inside, many down sides to this, I prefer to have some of them hours for myself and work later through the day/evening. Benefit of working for your self and able to choose your core hours.

0