Submitted by MAC3113 t3_10p92oh in wallstreetbets
catgirlshelter t1_j6j0hyi wrote
Reply to comment by VisualMod in Amazon($AMZN) Still Trading at 80 P/e & Rest of Big Tech Is 18-20 P/e? by MAC3113
I was going to say bad bot, but no, you belong here. If Amazon has a dominant market position in many areas of their business, how could there be enough room for growth to justify a P/E of 80? And AWS isn't a new area, it's been propping them up for years and they have like a third of the global market already. They're at the point where growth in most of their areas basically just put them at risk for antitrust lawsuits.
Excitedbox t1_j6j5jvc wrote
Exactly. AWS only has one way to go and that is down. Many companies are realizing that cloud is not all it is cracked up to be and moving back to onpremise. You can Colocate for 1/10th of what you pay for AWS and as soon as you reach a size where you are paying over $1k a month in AWS fees it is worth thinking about self-hosting and paying a few hours for maintenance from some IT company in your area. AWS would need to lower fees tremendously to be competitive or they will lose many of their bigger customers.
I feel that system lock in has been their saving grace for years, but as trends change, the rate of new customer acquisition will slow and therefore fewer people to fall into their trap. When people are only staying your customers to avoid the massive bill for moving their data out of your data center, that is not a recipe for success. It can literally cost 100s of thousands to transfer your data out, in addition to the costs of switching to a new system, so many companies want to avoid the large hit on a single quarterly report.
I have done the math and in some cases you are literally paying more in fees each month than it costs to buy the hardware outright. Remote hands from any decent hosting company costs under $150 an hour and I spend about 2 hours a month doing server maintenance for our servers. You can literally spend $5-7k upfront and buy your own server, colocate that for $100-200 in a datacenter instead of paying $2k to Amazon a month who also takes a huge payment upfront for the hardware. It doesn't take long until it makes sense to hire someone to take care of it in house and still save money over Amazon.
alanbataleon t1_j6jlser wrote
Literally what?? No enterprise or large corporation is realizing the cloud is not what it’s cracked up to be. Complete opposite. If you are still hosting on prem you’re literally ten years behind and asking for extended downtime or a host of other security vulnerabilities. The cloud has and will continue to be the enterprise standard for the future.
Options_100 t1_j6kd5ep wrote
Lol, so misinformed
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments