Submitted by CrackCody t3_10p5ozv in wallstreetbets
WroughtenPS2 t1_j6j7zru wrote
Reply to comment by Lost-Aardvark-7182 in Bulls: Shut up and take my money!! by CrackCody
It's not that good really. A lot of the writing was clearly written by someone who doesn't know anything about the subject matter and it makes the "professionals" look like idiots. Happens often in finance movies.
Lost-Aardvark-7182 t1_j6j87q5 wrote
I mean yeah but i don’t really watch it for the realism it’s more for the ambience it evokes
[deleted] t1_j6lblif wrote
[deleted]
WroughtenPS2 t1_j6j91wu wrote
Makes it unwatchable when one of the professionals is clueless about something basic.
nsgarcia10 t1_j6joqf5 wrote
They do that because the audience is the ones that likely don’t know anything about finance.
It’s a way to exposition dump.
You’d lost 99% of your audience if you made it accurate
ThatPizzaDeliveryGuy t1_j6jcbjv wrote
Haven't seen the movie, but wall street professionals being idiots seems pretty accurate to me
WroughtenPS2 t1_j6jdvlv wrote
You have a point. But it's a different kind of cluelessness.
William_Dowling t1_j6jia4k wrote
As someone who's spent decades in board rooms like that I thought the exact opposite. Clearly someone who'd spent shitloads of time in that environment and needed to explain it in simple terms to non-pros. The head of Risk, Sales, Trading, the CEO, all spot on.
WroughtenPS2 t1_j6jinte wrote
It was among the traders who should have understood risk, not talking about the CEO or the people who didn't necessarily have that expertise. I don't remember the exact moments from this movie, but one that always stands out for me as the epitome of Hollywood finance is in the Big Short when a trader doesn't know what a credit default swap is.
adamzzz8 t1_j6jy32b wrote
But that's there just so the world famous chef Anthony Bourdain can explain it to the audience who actually have no idea what that is.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments