Submitted by AndreTippettPoint t3_1154hnb in washingtondc
ilikeathesauce t1_j91t7uv wrote
Oh you haven’t heard? The solution is simple: Make it as difficult as possible for law abiding citizens to defend themselves or defend other victims, limit the police ability to respond and then refuse to prosecute if anyone gets arrested. Finally, if a violent offender ever does somehow accidentally slip through the cracks and gets convicted by mistake then we’ll simply ‘catch and release’ them back into the community ASAP.
After all, it would be unfair to hold an individual responsible for a violent crime they’ve committed because as we all know: violence is caused solely by inanimate objects.
/s
LoganSquire t1_j91wrkw wrote
Yeah, it would be much better if middle schoolers could legally carry guns to defend themselves.
ilikeathesauce t1_j91x0h2 wrote
I’m sure an ‘assault weapons ban’ would have prevented it from ever happening
NorseTikiBar t1_j91xrx9 wrote
So when that story came out about a 6 year old bringing a gun to school in Virginia, were you rooting for the kid?
ilikeathesauce t1_j9200fp wrote
Let me guess. The kid’s punishment should only be ‘grounded for the weekend’ since he’s a juvenile and his parents should serve life sentences for attempted murder right?
The gun he used should get the harshest punishment of all since it was the one that caused the harm.
NorseTikiBar t1_j924wx0 wrote
So that's a yes?
ilikeathesauce t1_j92hf7h wrote
I would have preferred if the teacher had shot the 6 year old. I assume you think the kid shouldn’t be punished
LevelDrawers t1_j93nzj8 wrote
Thank god there's a vast, vast gray area between those two extremes.
Zwicker101 t1_j963lwi wrote
Ah yes, the dichotomy of the situation: 1) Kid gets shot or 2) Teacher gets shot.
Certainly no middle ground.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments