WontStopAtSigns t1_j9harz5 wrote on February 21, 2023 at 11:39 PM

Reply to comment by umadbr00 in Two-thirds of McPherson Square homeless remain on street, D.C. says by SnortingCoffee

You literally just quoted me than paraphrased it wrong.

I can't teach you the nuances of written English.

umadbr00 t1_j9hoky1 wrote on February 22, 2023 at 1:18 AM

If you are insinuating that "the homeless" has some sort of different meaning than being homeless you're going to need to be explicit about what you mean. Clearly no one else in this comment thread understands you.

HamG0d t1_j9ihidm wrote on February 22, 2023 at 5:08 AM

He’s separating the individuals from the group.

His argument is that the problem isn’t that they are “the homeless”, the issue is that they were in that specific spot. So this wasn’t to combat “the homeless” or fix homelessness, but only to get those individuals out of that area.

WontStopAtSigns t1_j9hph8j wrote on February 22, 2023 at 1:24 AM

I'm not insinuating anything, I am very bluntly pointing out that you are either trolling me or genuinely don't understand what I clearly and correctly wrote.

We done here?

glopmod t1_j9i0poz wrote on February 22, 2023 at 2:47 AM

That's at least three people you have insisted are too stupid to understand you.

Maybe there's a constant in this issue where so many people can't get your shifting statement

WontStopAtSigns t1_j9i60tz wrote on February 22, 2023 at 3:28 AM

It's called piling on. Have you been to the internet before?

glopmod t1_j9i65hr wrote on February 22, 2023 at 3:29 AM

Maybe they're piling on because you said something fucking stupid and contradictory and refuse to back down from the demand that it should make sense to everyone

WontStopAtSigns t1_j9i6co0 wrote on February 22, 2023 at 3:31 AM

Jesus christ, I got 32 up votes, and 3 confused screamers, so I guess 10% can't fucking read. I'm alright with that.