Comments

You must log in or register to comment.

EugeneRicotta t1_jdt0lfd wrote on March 26, 2023 at 11:25 PM

#2,379,755

Yeah the new one is lame

dmanfire101 OP t1_jdt4650 wrote on March 26, 2023 at 11:52 PM

#2,380,256

Replying to EugeneRicotta (#2,379,755)

Yeah it looks like a stock photo

Wheresmycardigan t1_jdt9nk1 wrote on March 27, 2023 at 12:36 AM

#2,381,047

I prefer the one from 2018 (?).

This is too gaudy for me. Looks like it's a WMATA x JoJo Siwa collab (sorry Matt!)

ETA: this version. Im so sad I lost it. https://www.ebay.com/itm/334792819448?chn=ps&mkevt=1&mkcid=28

puttinonthefoil t1_jdte54s wrote on March 27, 2023 at 1:12 AM

#2,381,676

Replying to dmanfire101 (#2,380,256)

It…is?

bubbabubba345 t1_jdto1to wrote on March 27, 2023 at 2:36 AM

#2,383,138

Replying to puttinonthefoil (#2,381,676)

Yeah, the disappointment is because metro has done better in the past and totally could partner with local artists or at least get a good photograph if that want to go that route…

puttinonthefoil t1_jdtohd8 wrote on March 27, 2023 at 2:40 AM

#2,383,205

Replying to bubbabubba345 (#2,383,138)

You really think the photo on this year’scard is “bad”? I realize art is subjective but that is…a take for sure.

bubbabubba345 t1_jdtp80l wrote on March 27, 2023 at 2:47 AM

#2,383,320

Replying to puttinonthefoil (#2,383,205)

I don’t think it’s bad per se but I’ve seen other cards that had nicely edited photos (2018/2019 I think?), and this one was just a super intense HDR. Maybe I’m picky because I’m into photography but cherry blossom cards are among the cooler ones Metro puts out each year, so I thought they’d have something better imo.

LeytonForest t1_jdtu0dx wrote on March 27, 2023 at 3:28 AM

#2,383,964

I have the same one!

[deleted] t1_jdutmjg wrote on March 27, 2023 at 11:05 AM

#2,388,260

Replying to bubbabubba345 (#2,383,320)

[removed]

thecheeper t1_jdv2e9g wrote on March 27, 2023 at 12:34 PM

#2,389,550

That’s the one that I use! IMHO the art is a really fun take on the festival.