Submitted by bearface93 t3_ya4tgg in washingtondc
[deleted] t1_itbwqdb wrote
Reply to comment by Less_Wrong_ in ….how? by bearface93
[deleted]
marvsup t1_itbz9lj wrote
I mean, it's contextual
[deleted] t1_itc175y wrote
[deleted]
marvsup t1_itc6s39 wrote
I mean, if we're talking about "feds trying to bait eavesdroppers," I'm pretty sure everyone would understand the implication is some kind of federal policing agent and not like someone who clerks for a house rep or something
Edit: but I guess that's not really what you were responding to, my bad
[deleted] t1_itc0ury wrote
[deleted]
Cool_Story_Bra t1_itc2lpj wrote
Do we? Because I dont say that. Don’t know anybody who does
[deleted] t1_itegkcx wrote
[deleted]
Less_Wrong_ t1_itc15zq wrote
It’s giving “”I work on classified stuff” when DoD douchebros in Ballston try to impress you” vibes
[deleted] t1_itc1ikp wrote
[deleted]
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments