NorseTikiBar t1_it025ws wrote on October 19, 2022 at 11:11 PM

Reply to comment by asldkjgljkaeiovne in Car stolen, crashed with baby in back seat in Northeast DC; 14-year-old suspect arrested by drr71-2

> but I find it irrational to label Republicans as fascist, or semi-fascist, and ignorant, willfully or otherwise.

Then you must've just woke up from a 7 year coma.

> I'll name one example, the Roe decision, which by the way RBG would've agreed with the majority as she's stated numerous times she believed the Fourth didn't support.

That issue was solved with Casey v Planned Parenthood, but I shouldn't be surprised you're ignorant on the facts here, too.

> The Justices didn't say abortion should be illegal, they only decided the case law was faulty.

No, they decided to blatantly ignore precedent for partisan objectives.

Fit-Negotiation-2917 t1_it15zhs wrote on October 20, 2022 at 4:30 AM

They said the precedent was incorrectly decided. Just because something is precedent, doesn’t mean that it gets automatic deference all the time.

Precedent is overturned constantly if you paid attention.

NorseTikiBar t1_it168vj wrote on October 20, 2022 at 4:33 AM

In other words: "I'm happy that my side won, and I don't give a shit about the legal gymnastics that went into it."

Fit-Negotiation-2917 t1_it1may3 wrote on October 20, 2022 at 7:59 AM

Lolwut. How do you manage to twist what I said into that? Some messed up logic (or lack thereof).