Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

abovethe_clouds OP t1_j4te75m wrote

It could certainly be interpreted as such. I imagine they will say that's for instances in which a vehicle is so obscure that a NADA value doesn't exist. That's how I read it. I agree that it's worth a shot.

13

fissionpowered t1_j4uqpkd wrote

Someone might say that, but the NADA guide is quite exhaustive, covering basically all cars dating back to 1926.

I would be somewhat surprised if there is a single car registered in DC that doesn't have a published NADA book value.

2