Comments

You must log in or register to comment.

Purple-Asparagus9677 t1_jacgkox wrote

First time I’ve seen comments on a RT article sound concerned. People posting how if the Kremlin can’t detect a UAV how are they going to detect and engage an ICBM.

25

LittleStar854 t1_jacmfsc wrote

Ukraine Someone has been bombing strategic military targets in Russia for months, Engels airbase where Russia keeps nuclear bombers has been hit at least twice. Last month or so there has been videos of placing an air defense vehicle on the roofs of several buildings in Moscow.

16

LordPennybag t1_jacqvte wrote

I'd be concerned about people who don't understand the difference between drones and ICBMs.

12

Jericola t1_jae1om4 wrote

Huh? What’s the connection?

An ICBM is a high altitude rocket flying at 7/km a second. Each side can deliver just over a thousand nuclear weapons via ICBMs.

Russia and the USA can destroy each other in an hour.

1

Purple-Asparagus9677 t1_jae6oqu wrote

No clue, I don’t speak to understand Russian logic. Just know they were actually concerned for once rather than blaming nazi Jewish people.

4

QzinPL t1_jaf0i2h wrote

Well I have serious doubts about russian capability of delivering more than 10. Since the upkeep of nuclear warheads costs a lot of money and you know... no one expects nuclear war, it's more of a deterrent so... let's spend it on yachts!

1

unrulyhoneycomb t1_jad3lts wrote

Failed attack? Not sure about that. Consider it a warning.

Psyops are a big deal in war, and the intended objective of these flyovers may have been to wake up the Russian zombies who think that they are isolated from the consequences of their government’s ill-doings. The social contract that Putin has with his people after all, is to do whatever, but ultimately keep them out of politics. Hard to say you’re keeping them out of politics when they’ve got military drones crashing into their backyards out of nowhere.

11

RTwhyNot t1_jae93is wrote

Screams a Putin special: false flag attack.

2

AutoModerator t1_jacf1tp wrote

Hi stockhackerDFW. Your submission from reuters.com is behind a registration wall. A registration wall limits the number of free articles users can access before they are required to register an account to log in to continue reading it. While your submission was not removed, users are discouraged from upvoting it or commenting on it.

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

1

[deleted] t1_jacgn02 wrote

[deleted]

−10

DeeHawk t1_jacq2p0 wrote

You need to end your sentence with "/s" when being sarcastic, otherwise it's impossible to know without reading your comment history.

5