BlueJinjo t1_j9jjw21 wrote
Reply to comment by mistaekNot in Dutch intelligence services have warned that Russia is "covertly mapping" key energy infrastructure in the North Sea, in preparation for possible sabotage attacks. by green_flash
You think NATO wouldn't suffer losses as well when supply chains are interrupted due to the harsh winters + when a unified Russian front defends itself?
NATO would win but it would burn so much money and most importantly lives on both sides.
There's essentially 0% chance this happens. For whatever reason, this sensationalist sub is rooting for it.. it's similar to the propensity of this sub to expect a full on militaristic invasion between India and china every time there's a border dispute which will continue to happen for the next 10+ years. Stop snorting crack
Open_Blackberry_4901 t1_j9k3y7p wrote
I prefer to smoke my crack, thank you very much.
BadYabu t1_j9jn4nd wrote
A Ukraine being supplied with weapons and training at a trickling pace is embarrassing Russia but the full force of NATO in a non-nuclear war would be a pyrrhic victory. Logic checks out.
BlueJinjo t1_j9jo6xm wrote
Invading a country is significantly harder than defending a country.. If Russia was invaded they'd also use nukes.
If the loss of life would definitely be NONCATACLYSMIC, NATO forces would already be at Moscow's doorsteps..
I don't think you've ever opened a history book. Finish high school and college and then maybe we can have a discussion
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments