Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

Redneckmoans t1_jaae2zz wrote

−16

The-Entity t1_jaak597 wrote

Not to mention the disturbance of birds, which are also an important part of the ecosystem.

5

irk5nil t1_jacb1v2 wrote

> wind turbines put a bunch of micro and nano plastic

Say what? Any plastic in wind turbines is just pee in the ocean compared to the rest. Like, we're talking less than 1%. How about we get rid of nondegradable packaging materials first?

3

Redneckmoans t1_jacd21j wrote

I don't see how the two are in conflict. Let's do both

1

irk5nil t1_jacdabd wrote

Let's do what, not build wind turbines which displace fossil fuel generation? Surely not!

3

Redneckmoans t1_jacf0fb wrote

There are plenty of alternatives to wind turbines that aren't fossil fuel based which do far less harm to fragile ecosystems.

−1

EphraimJenkins t1_jaaeztw wrote

No more than what’s already there.

−4

Redneckmoans t1_jaaf5m2 wrote

That’s been disproven by comparing water samples before and after windmills were put near rivers

1