mayasky76 t1_j9u8vna wrote
Reply to comment by nonrandomusername17 in Boris Johnson calls on UK to 'break the ice' by sending fighter jets to Ukraine - and warns China against 'historic mistake' by R1ckCrypto
I..... I think I love you.
Nothing gets my goat more than stupid people implying decimation means complete destruction of something.
You still have 90% of your army after it's been decimated FFS
M17CH t1_j9uqva1 wrote
In modern usage it has a different meaning. I wonder if you subscribe to this same thought for the phrase "well-regulated."
Also let's not act like you aren't saying this because you saw the TIL from a couple days ago.
Intruder313 t1_j9wbvpp wrote
When people use 'decimate' incorrectly I educate them.
M17CH t1_j9wfn5c wrote
They aren't using it incorrectly. It has taken on a new meaning in the modern world. The historical definition is not the "correct" way to use it.
I_Am_NOT_The_Titan t1_j9x7wg2 wrote
🤓
mayasky76 t1_j9urjj4 wrote
Wtf are you talking about....
You think I.... a 47yr old British person with a BBC accent you wouldn't belive, someone who actually had Latin lessons in school..... need a reddit TIL to learn the meaning of the word decimate.
Sigh.... dei gratia sum quod sum eh!
We also know what well regulated means. We have a dictionary over here.
Millenniauld t1_j9waf3f wrote
Id est quod est, people like him will always think that education means "saw a meme on reddit" because it's the only way they know anything.
M17CH t1_j9uxuqr wrote
>need a reddit TIL to learn the meaning of the word decimate.
Yes. Historical meaning btw, not current.
>Sigh.... dei gratia sum quod sum eh!
Posting a phrase in Latin anonymously behind a screen is proof of absolutely nothing.
>We also know what well regulated means. We have a dictionary over here.
So then you would acknowledge that "well-regulated" in the historical sense is not prescribing heavy restrictions.
Either way, you're purposely using a long out of favour definition for a "gotcha" moment.
mayasky76 t1_j9v3zq1 wrote
Lol. Well u/M17CH I'm sure you have me there.... posting anonymously on reddit . What sort of cunt does that eh!
M17CH t1_j9v8oog wrote
It's not about being anonymous, that's the standard.
It's about thinking that posting a single phrase that you could have simply googled is proof at all of your ability to read, write, or speak Latin.
But you already know that. You're just trying to avoid it.
[deleted] t1_j9vcv3a wrote
[removed]
M17CH t1_j9wysa4 wrote
>I see you have been googling English then you clever clever bastard... no let me guess you've been writing in esperanto and using Google translate for English.... naughty naughty
Correct.
>Some. People. Still .know Latin you muppet
Yes of course. Also please be nice.
>I did my amo, amas, amat at school and you probably know some like E plurubus unum. Or deus ex machina. There are commonly known Latin phrases and I can almost be certain that everyone i went to school with know dei gratia sum quod sum as it was said every frigging day in assembly.
I don't know any Latin.
>I even know a bit of Welsh too and some mandarin... how is that even possible
Good question.
>Jesus, you do know that people out there in the world know different stuff from you?
Yes.
I just find it a funny coincidence that there are so many experts on the origins and historical definition of the word "decimate" mere days after a popular post about just that word. If you had that in your data banks before then, then I am happy for you. It is still weirdly elitist and not even really all that accurate to consider that historical definition of "decimate" as the correct usage in the modern day. It isn't used that way anymore. It has taken on a new meaning. To say someone is incorrect for using it another way is not really true.
>stupid people implying decimation means complete destruction of something
People are not stupid for using the more recent and culturally accurate definition of the word. Please be nicer.
FatherSlippyfist t1_j9uplfs wrote
The meaning of words is given by usage. Lots of us know the origin of decimate, but it doesn't matter because that's not what it means anymore. If you look in Oxford, it says "kill, destroy, or remove a large percentage or part of".
It list the one in ten definition as "historical".
mayasky76 t1_j9uqwfk wrote
When you go to the doctor for an appendectomy you'd better hope some cunt hasn't been using it as a slang term for castration...
Also.. literally cannot mean exactly the opposite of figuratively which is how it gets commonly used.... thats not changing the meaning, its getting it fucking wrong
2+2 = Geoff hurst in the 1966 world cup kinda wrong.
Words HAVE to have a defined meaning or you just end up at green wallaby .
Get just the first thing that will still!
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments