Comments

You must log in or register to comment.

joebadiah t1_jdy495u wrote

No way comments go the wrong direction.

14

autotldr t1_jdy4r7l wrote

This is the best tl;dr I could make, original reduced by 88%. (I'm a bot)


> Tiny glass beads strewn across the moon's surface contain potentially billions of tonnes of water that could be extracted and used by astronauts on future lunar missions, researchers say.

> The latest research, published in Nature Geoscience, points to fine glass beads as the source of that surface water.

> Further tests on the material showed the water diffuses in and out of the beads on the timeframe of a few years, confirming an active water cycle on the moon.


Extended Summary | FAQ | Feedback | Top keywords: water^#1 moon^#2 beads^#3 material^#4 lunar^#5

5

Latyon t1_jdy4yii wrote

If true and if a process exists that is simple enough to utilize on the lunar surface

Huge

7

IDoPokeSmot t1_jdy586n wrote

I don't know how the people of the moon would feel about us taking their water......

28

Struboob t1_jdy68i4 wrote

I want a bucket of those things

2

Duchess430 t1_jdy6etl wrote

Pretty sure the Whalers on the moon who carry a Harpoon won't be happy about earth taking their water, by the year 3000 there won't be able whales and all they do is just sing tell tall tales and sing a whaling tune

10

zirky t1_jdy7j75 wrote

in other news, nestle is partnering with spacex to develop a privately funded moon base

108

Customer-Useful t1_jdypndv wrote

Why? Don't we have enough water and isn't it mind-bottlingly inefficient to transport heavy things through space? Is it because we can sustain life on the moon easier than if no water was there?

−2

PopeHonkersXII t1_jdys0ux wrote

In 20 years, Pepsi will be selling bottles of the stuff in vending machines. I know how capitalism works

2

--Muther-- t1_jdyscfo wrote

One of the major barriers to space exploration is the high cost to weight ratio of leaving the Earths Gravity well.

If you could base a major component of your lift capability and refueling capability outside earth's gravity our ability to explore just increased exponentially. To do that you need a source of hydrogen and oxygen, for fuel, by a qirk of nature water has both of those things.

7

Customer-Useful t1_jdyt256 wrote

I never really thought about the fact that propulsion isn't needed to move when you're in space.

So we need some way to conduct electrolysis on a major scale ON the moon? Solar power or something? I'm no expert but surely you can't use a set amount of fuel to make MORE fuel via electrolysis.

2

simonp101 t1_jdz1cp0 wrote

It might come in handy, once THEY are done poisoning all the water on planet Earth.

−2

Goodbadgoodgood t1_jdz9v5k wrote

Now we can harvest the moon and completely disrupt the flow of the ocean and destroy the earth further to get rich!!!!!!

−2

Grabba-The-Butt t1_je0echz wrote

How big are these glass beads? I hear beads and I imagine very small.

3

Customer-Useful t1_je0vi4n wrote

  • Is it because we can sustain life on the moon easier than if no water was there?

Am I wrong or doesn't this state that what you all agree with? "Easier than if no water was there" doesn't that mean I'm saying water makes it easier?

1

HoplandTek t1_je4g9l6 wrote

Nestlé: "PLANT OUR FLAG, NOW!!!"

"Welcome, terran labourer to the Nestlé moon colony. Here you will enjoy rocks, metal tubes and domicile pods, with a single bunk per labourer. Here you can earn a taxless wage in our libertarian utopia."

"Notice: the cost of accomodation, oxygen, water and Grool™ will be deducted from your pay, amounting to 75% of your wages. A flight back to earth is approximately 50 wages in total."

1