Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

Suessbot t1_iuf9ld3 wrote

I did.
And that hole was already closing by the time you heard about it. They were theorizing that it was a natural phenomenon. They know a little better now but it still seems to close every decade or so.

−1

sicariobrothers t1_iugm7df wrote

Ok I’ll bite. What is your outlook on man made climate change.

2

Suessbot t1_iuhd3yj wrote

irrelevant to this conversation.
im not denying the hole exists. im only pointing out that it seems to be closing every couple decades. in fact, it was closing shortly after they discovered it.

−1

Bergensis t1_iujvd79 wrote

> I did.

Which ones?

While I didn't read scientific publications in the 1980s, I did watch the news, and the signing of the Vienna Convention for the Protection of the Ozone Layer would have made the news.

>And that hole was already closing by the time you heard about it. They were theorizing that it was a natural phenomenon. They know a little better now but it still seems to close every decade or so.

The hole is constantly opening and closing, as there are natural seasonal variations. It appears that it is a natural phenomenon that is made worse by human pollution. While the fight against ozone-depleting substances have largely been a success, there have been setbacks:

https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-019-02109-2

1

Suessbot t1_iuk3tmo wrote

> The hole is constantly opening and closing, as there are natural seasonal variations. It appears that it is a natural phenomenon that is made worse by human pollution.

That's exactly the point.
Too bad the article and none of the other media say that. All the media ever does is post a "yay we fixed it" pat on the back article about some legislation that was passed, like banning CFCs.

1