Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

Stranger0nTheWeb t1_ixojtnq wrote

>People can deal with the consequences of their own actions, i didnt make them go out and get pregnant.

So a smoker shouldn't be allowed to get treatment for lung cancer? A drunk driver shouldn't get medical treatment when they crash? Those are consequences of ther actions. Oh wait no those things can also happen to men...


dowhatmelo t1_ixonsys wrote

Not if the "treatment" is murdering someone else.

This is not a men vs women thing, this is about the rights of the unborn child.


Stranger0nTheWeb t1_ixout14 wrote

The unborn child does not have the right to use the mother's organs to sustain itself if she does not want it to. And pregnancy is dangerous for women. It's the mother's choice whether it stays inside her or not.

And why not consider male masturbation/ ejaculating into a condom mass murder? Why is a sperm only considered an "unborn child" the moment it touches an egg and its the woman's problem?


dowhatmelo t1_ixpffxn wrote

Sure it does.

Because sperm on its own is not viable.