Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

Utxi4m t1_ixsc17n wrote

>Are wind turbines dangerously radioactive for 200,000 years?

You don't even care about the massive environmental destruction your preferred energy source causes? You didn't even react to the staggering destruction a single turbine causes.

Is this a case of winning being more important than doing good?

Also, is nuclear waste dangerously radioactive for 200,000 years? No.

The thing with radioactivity is that the danger of it is pretty closely reversely correlated with the half life of the various isotopes. Stuff with a half life measured in seconds, days or months can really dose out some significant doses of ionising radiation, while stuff with half-lifes numbering in the tens of thousands of years is pretty harmless (from a radiological point of view).

6

ThisistheInfiniteIs t1_ixscoer wrote

More lies and distortions from the nuke shills

You fools don't get paid enough to sound so ignorant

−4

Preisschild t1_ixu3x6u wrote

Materials in solar panels are not only bad for 30 years (as with nuclear), but forever.

0