Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

[deleted] t1_j1ioes4 wrote

Ah yes the fan boi of batteries charged by coal plants

0

[deleted] t1_j1kcpgs wrote

[deleted]

1

[deleted] t1_j1kda1i wrote

So you didn’t even read that article then? Yes they are correct, problem is the the countries who don’t use majority coal or other fossil fuel plants for electricity production are also the smallest percentage of the worlds producers of energy. Let me ask you this, what would need to happen to have India, China, Russia, and the USA to replace their energy consumption with majority renewable? What would be the direct cost? How about the indirect cost? What would you consider a reasonable timeline. Would your timeline be feasible without destroying their, and by extension the worlds, GDP?

0

[deleted] t1_j1kdnr1 wrote

[deleted]

1

[deleted] t1_j1keboa wrote

Well gee I guess by saying it’s less without giving a figure is super accurate. You are just wrong and I’m sorry that you hate it but if the majority of the world continues to use fossil fuels for electricity generation than it’s the same. I’ve actually studied this in graduate school and know way more than you. So be a Pinko all you want but it won’t make you right.

0

[deleted] t1_j1keu77 wrote

[deleted]

1

[deleted] t1_j1kex7x wrote

Yea twisted facts that aren’t applicable on the world scale.

0

[deleted] t1_j1kfmli wrote

[deleted]

1

[deleted] t1_j1kfuot wrote

No I refuted your sources and explained why, you refused to accept the obvious

0

[deleted] t1_j1kg1fu wrote

[deleted]

1

[deleted] t1_j1kg50o wrote

I didn’t say it wasn’t right. I said the study doesn’t represent what you want it to and I explained why

1