Submitted by inAbigworld t3_10q6dmf in worldnews
Full_Time_Hungry t1_j6o5ohp wrote
The article literally says 10.5 years each...
PandaMuffin1 t1_j6o7pbs wrote
You are not allowed to editorialize headlines.
10.5 X 2 = 21 years, so I guess that is what the source was going for. It is still a ridiculous sentence for merely dancing and I hope you would agree.
inAbigworld OP t1_j6o86w6 wrote
I agree, the title is misleading. I didn't edit it.
inAbigworld OP t1_j6o6hp2 wrote
Yeah, 21 for both. For a video of dancing.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments