Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

CalmRadBee t1_j5q0cqh wrote

Reply to comment by geophilo in Brazil's Lula appoints Indigenous ministers to reverse Amazon deforestation by loggiews

Some? Across the board he has amazing ideals, hopefully the Bolsonaro supporting military doesn't step in here and prevent progress.

17

666ilent t1_j5q2oqr wrote

Last time he was president Brazil had the largest economic growth in 30 years. Brazil became a net creditor and was taken off the world hunger list. I think lula is more than qualified to deal with this

21

beckeiche t1_j5qftje wrote

Then Dilma collected the fruit of all his good deeds right ? So much the population was 100% behind him and his party ,and didn’t elect a dumb right wing dictator wannabe! And no money was robbed and no corruption cases arose ! And he never invested money outside of the country when the country needed inside !! …. Oh wait … that also didn’t happen

6

LLJKCicero t1_j5qq4m2 wrote

> Across the board he has amazing ideals

Not in foreign policy, where he does the "both sides" thing when it comes to Russian invading Ukraine.

Domestically he seems pretty great though.

−1

CalmRadBee t1_j5r34de wrote

The global south has been exploited by western hegemony for a long time, he has good reason to be suspect of NATO expansion.

5

LLJKCicero t1_j5r3f8d wrote

Being critical of NATO is fine.

Acting like Russia and 'the West'/Ukraine have anywhere close to equal culpability for this invasion is not.

> suspect of NATO expansion.

Gee, I wonder why Ukraine might want to be a part of NATO? Truly, it is a mystery for the ages.

1

CalmRadBee t1_j5r4u8e wrote

I agree with you on the intentions behind the invasion. I have a few opinions and theories on the true nature of it.

No need to be snarky. Or course it's obvious. Nonetheless NATO definitely shouldn't be meddling that far east. This whole thing, without a doubt, is Russia and the West testing the boundaries. Russia has all the reason to not want NATO expanding to its borders, and NATO has all the reason to want the war to go on as long as possible and to deplete Russia of everything it has. The war is dumb as hell and needs to end, people are dying so two world powers can flex and exhaust

2

LLJKCicero t1_j5r58x4 wrote

> Nonetheless NATO definitely shouldn't be meddling that far east.

Ukraine is a sovereign country with more-than-obvious reason to be worried about Russia. Of course they want to join NATO, they have excellent reasons for wanting that.

Framing is as "NATO meddling" is bullshit dictator apologia. Try asking Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania how "NATO meddling" has gone for them.

> Russia has all the reason to not want NATO expanding to its borders

You mean the borders NATO is already at, especially with the Baltic states? You make it sound like NATO isn't already there. How much has NATO used those countries to invade Russia so far?

And yes, Russia has an obvious reason for not wanting NATO to expand further along its borders: it makes it much harder for them to invade anyone, slaughter civilians, and take more land.

> The war is dumb as hell and needs to end, people are dying so two world powers can flex and exhaust

Obviously. But Russia can leave whenever they want and it'd be fine. Ukraine giving up means surrendering land and the ongoing lives of those people to Russian control, or even giving up their entire state, as Putin tried in the beginning of last year.

Russia needs to be forced to stop. Any other outcome is favoring Putin.

5