Comments

You must log in or register to comment.

Malstrom42 t1_j6nj91b wrote

I work in downtown Surrey, and ANYTHING to help welcome. We have so many deaths in that area.

78

autotldr t1_j6nke3d wrote

This is the best tl;dr I could make, original reduced by 80%. (I'm a bot)


> Ottawa - A Canadian province on Tuesday decriminalized the possession of small amounts of cocaine, heroin, fentanyl and other hard drugs in a radical policy shift to address an opioid overdose crisis that has killed thousands.

> Kathryn Botchford, whose husband Jason died of a drug overdose in 2019, said she had no idea he'd even been using drugs.

> Canada has spent more than Can$800 million to try to stem the opioid crisis, including on addiction treatment, Naloxone supplies and opening 39 supervised drug consumption sites across Canada.


Extended Summary | FAQ | Feedback | Top keywords: drug^#1 addiction^#2 more^#3 health^#4 people^#5

6

healthooray t1_j6nvrex wrote

It’s British Columbia. Why not put it in the headline, cbs news?

252

lilrabbitfoofoo t1_j6nyw0o wrote

Legalize/decriminalize and regulate quality and age access (like everyone already does with alchohol, tobacco, and now marijuana).

Adults have the right to do whatever they want to their own bodies, just not to all the rest of us, of course. It is, after all, the very meaning of being an adult, right?

11

abuomak t1_j6o644v wrote

Philadelphia next!

Do Philadelphia next!

2

SurealGod t1_j6o7ixn wrote

How I view this is that the more you tell people not do something, they're going to want to do it even more. Some might even do it just to spite you.

So I can see this going in a positive direction weirdly.

4

dizzariffic t1_j6o8348 wrote

Portugal also has mandatory treatment, however. Canada will not. There's little change in "help" for those that will use this system, Portugal has tons. So, im skeptical, but I suppose we'll see!

129

nailbunny2000 t1_j6obegw wrote

I hope it helps make it better, because it sure can't make it any worse.

17

ChiralWolf t1_j6ohd4a wrote

There's also the huge issue of getting people help. Understandably, when someone is in possession of illegal drugs, theyre going to be wary about getting help from a group that might have ties to the government. You decriminalize basic possession and it opens more of those people up to seeking help.

8

pineconewashington t1_j6ohehs wrote

How it really helps is that people wouldn’t be afraid of reaching out for help and scoring these drugs wouldn’t be so dangerous. It would help people test for additives, seek mental/emergency services more readily, and help reduce the stigma around these substances. Instead of jail, those that are battling addiction would now be more free to talk about it in the open. I wouldn’t say people seek these substances out because they’re forbidden, but rather it’s almost always stress/pain/mental illness of some kind. Now we also need to add a ton of rehabilitative services that are low cost or covered by MSP.

8

godisanelectricolive t1_j6oip6v wrote

Their "dissuasion commissions" made up of lawyers and social workers do not have the power to mandate compulsory treatment. They either recommend treatment or community service for addicts and if they refuse the commission can issue a sanction such a fine or taking away personal possessions.

Authorities can't forcibly drag addicts into treatment but once they voluntarily consent to treatment they have conditions for release, you can't just check yourself out any time if you have a history of overdosing. Apparently 85% of their addicts voluntarily agree to treatment when asked to by a dissuasion commission.

27

FiveDirtyDishes t1_j6ojvhq wrote

“Canada province”. Just say the name of the province.

23

Feruk_II t1_j6okfur wrote

They decriminalized possession, but kept the punishments for distribution. So drug quality will remain the same, similar number of people will likely use (if not slightly more that just feared the penalties), cops will return drugs to people rather than confiscating them, and the number of deaths will drop?! What?

If you're gonna decriminalize it, at least provide a safe source for it??

16

Drift3r_ t1_j6okrhh wrote

Very interested to see if this works.

25

Awkward-Assumption35 t1_j6onzx9 wrote

One of the stated aims is to reduce stigma. But the stigma of these drugs keeps a lot of people from trying in the first place. If you reduce that, you may end up with lots of people with a more casual attitude who end up hooked.

I don’t think this will achieve what the provincial government hopes.

18

FrozenHoneyJar t1_j6ood9k wrote

What a tragic outlook. These are people with stories of insurmountable difficulty, that are immensely complex, who need assistance in a failing system. It’s evident that you have very little experience with the nuanced grip of addiction, so please do not speak on it.

8

GishathOnABicycle t1_j6op54s wrote

I feel really sorry for you, I live around this demographic of people and I know it comes with some challenges but it is easy enough to avoid.

These poor humans have gone through things you. Couldn’t even imagine and the worst day of their life is everyday and tomorrow. You have no idea what it’s like to be them.

13

GreaserG t1_j6or1e9 wrote

Just lock them up and make them do labour until they're too tired to pickup a needle

−9

kimbosdurag t1_j6orpd8 wrote

No one is doing a cost benefit analysis and saying "hey you know what? I should start doing heroin and live on the street, seems worth it." I hope that you or someone you love never finds themselves in that position it's not a life I'd wish on anyone.

20

WishYaPeaceSomeday t1_j6oxaxh wrote

Legalize all drugs.

Let people put what they want in their own bodies. My body my choice right? You respect bodily autonomy correct?

It's very clear yall don't want to make life bearable. The dropping birth rate tells me everyone understands this at some level. So let us get high instead.

Unclench your butthole for the first time in human history and end the war on drugs. Just fabricate a new excuse to be a fascist like you did when the war on drugs started.

−2

witchnyc8537 t1_j6ozw2z wrote

Criminalizing self harm has always been wrong.

I get self harm extends outward when it gets big enough and then it’s a social concern.

So only criminalize to an extra extent the laws people do break when they’re messed up (and not every even very messed up person does horrible things while messed up - I don’t mean in the it hurts other peoples feelings that someone is messed up way and that does matter too for family and friends but is not criminal; I mean in the drunk driving/murder/child abuse thing)

−5

djqvoteme t1_j6p41y4 wrote

The federal government has permitted the province to conduct this trial without any criminal penalties.

https://news.gov.bc.ca/releases/2023MMHA0005-000106

>Health Canada granted the Province of B.C. a subsection 56(1) exemption under the Controlled Drugs and Substances Act to decriminalize people who use drugs. Beginning Jan. 31, 2023, until Jan. 31, 2026, adults (18 and older) in B.C. will not be subject to criminal charges if they possess a small amount of certain illegal drugs for personal use.

Here's the statement from the federal associate minister of Health

https://www.canada.ca/en/health-canada/news/2023/01/statement-from-the-minister-of-mental-health-and-addictions-and-associate-minister-of-health-on-the-implementation-of-the-subsection-561-exemption-.html

>On May 31, 2022, I announced the granting of a time-limited exemption under the Controlled Drugs and Substances Act for adults in the province of B.C. As of tomorrow, January 31, 2023, until January 31, 2026, adults aged 18 years or older within B.C will not be subject to criminal charges for the possession of small amounts of opioids, cocaine, methamphetamine, and MDMA for personal use.

6

pepelepew111111 t1_j6p7mx8 wrote

They should legalize it and regulate it, like alcohol or cigarettes. Taking a big chunk of the organized crime, gangs and violence out of the equation would be a huge public benefit.

3

MXC_Vic_Romano t1_j6p9kgm wrote

Portugal also improved access to treatment as part of decriminalization which BC isn't doing for this three year trial. Drugs have practically been decriminalized in the DTES for years already, this is just making it official province wide. Without improving access to treatment it's rather difficult to imagine this will have a positive impact.

20

Ivy_lane_Denizen t1_j6paulj wrote

Other countries have seen a lot of success with this method. I dont know Canada's and assume its similar.

The idea is to remove barriers to recovery as well as making it safe for people to consume.

Things like more pure drugs (not cut with anything dangerous), clean needles, lightening stigma, a support network, and doctors on site.

33

djqvoteme t1_j6pb2y6 wrote

This story comes from a newswire, specifically Agence France-Presse. I doubt anyone outside of Canada or the U.S. could name like 2 Canadian provinces or even know what British Columbia is.

The BBC (and other European news agencies) do stuff like this too for Canada all the time. It's bizarre as a Canadian, but understandable why.

8

rwarren85 t1_j6pbbkp wrote

Look at weed. Once decriminalization it starts getting monitored and safer ways to get the drugs are presented. I see what you are saying, but there are examples of this method having good results.

5

art-love-social t1_j6pbrww wrote

How will it enable more pure drugs ? [ I assume they already have a clean needle program - most places have] - thre is no mention of support network or doctors on sites. The Portuguese model works-ish because the users are persuaded to join a rehab. Once they are in rehab - they cannot leave/just sign themselves out

12

joxeloj t1_j6pcadn wrote

Compulsory treatment is objectively ineffective and only serves to further a moral crusade against drug use. The vast majority of the social, economic, and health consequences of which arise from its stigmatization and a lack of regulation.

Even voluntary, motivated treatment has much poorer effectiveness than the vast majority of people seem to believe. The most effective treatment for opioid addiction, the global gold standard, is literally giving the individual stable daily doses of opioids to take in place of street opioids. The most effective opioid replacement therapies in terms of quality of life, socioeconomic functioning, and health outcome/preventing deaths are literally the more recreational opiates; buprenorphine < methadone < oral morphine < injectable hydromorphone.

−9

TildeCommaEsc t1_j6pcst7 wrote

This won't change much of anything. For all intent and purpose drugs already were decriminalized. Either they were not charged or they were charged released and when the court case came up given unsupervised probation.

So no real change.

8

Cultural_Yam7212 t1_j6pei48 wrote

It works in Portugal because it’s a small country. Portland decriminalized hard drugs and there’s open drug use all over. It’s gotten significantly worse, and people flock here because they won’t get arrested. It’s only works if actual rehab and mental health facilities are available

29

Florp_Incarnate t1_j6piive wrote

BC Government: "We're doing something!" while they continue to follow the same path that has made the Downtown East Side a dump for 30+ years. Ditto SF, Ditto Seattle. Failed ideology leads to failed outcomes.

5

hoimass t1_j6pjp4i wrote

All recreational drugs should be decriminalized at the very least.

6