Comments

You must log in or register to comment.

Yelmel t1_j5qudsk wrote

On what grounds can they ban? It doesn't say. Is it hate speech? Sounds like it's just embarrassing.

12

HelixFish t1_j5qul89 wrote

The world really needs to stop this cult of personality bullshit. Can we all just grow up a bit?

18

tickleyourfanny t1_j5qzi8w wrote

fuck, the next time I am going to promote a movie I need to get someone to try and ban it..I bet endless more people watch this now than before they raised an outcry. Some producer is seeing $ signs.

5

MrDBoBo t1_j5qzmcl wrote

I think he's an awesome leader. E.g. Hundreds of millions pulled out of Extreme poverty (according to the Economist). Nevertheless, it shouldn't be banned. If they want they should make a counter documentary.

Then we get onto more philosophical questions, would we ban fascist propaganda? Do we ban blunt misinformation?

−8

autotldr t1_j5r20s2 wrote

This is the best tl;dr I could make, original reduced by 83%. (I'm a bot)


> India has banned a BBC documentary critical of Prime Minister Narendra Modi's alleged role in deadly riots more than 20 years ago from being shown in the country, in a move critics decried as an assault on press freedom.

> The two-part documentary "India: The Modi Question," criticizes Modi, who was the chief minister of the western state of Gujarat in 2002 when riots broke out between the state's majority Hindus and minority Muslims.

> The BBC said Jack Straw, who was British foreign secretary in 2002 and features in the documentary, claims that Modi had "Played a pre-active part in pulling back the police and in tacitly encouraging the Hindu extremists."


Extended Summary | FAQ | Feedback | Top keywords: documentary^#1 BBC^#2 India^#3 Modi^#4 government^#5

5

PrimeTime0000 t1_j5r6lgk wrote

I think it’s always important to hear different perspectives without being offended. It seems the world as a whole isn’t of that mind set.

3

bobby-mcshabi OP t1_j5rco3i wrote

Not entirely: https://m.thewire.in/article/history/sikh-history-bjp-distor-anti-muslim-hate/amp

Buddhism and Jainism are a considerably less population than Sikhism, Islam, and Hinduism.

All he wants is votes from the 2 communities that share some considerably similar aspects with Hinduism.

Mind you, most voters in his party (and within his party), the BJP, think that you being Hindu AND being able to speak Hindi means that you are a true Indian.

https://imgur.com/a/uEOa0rs

https://www.trtworld.com/magazine/most-indians-believe-only-a-hindu-can-be-an-indian-47967/amp

The same BJP that institutes Hindutva and helps/partners with the RSS https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hindutva (terrorists) organization which is, pretty bad.

The BJP claims that Hindutva represents "cultural nationalism" and its conception of "Indian nationhood", but not a religious or theocratic concept.[115] It is "India's identity", according to the RSS Chief Mohan Bhagwat.[116]

Edit: if you downvote me, why? What I said is backed up by the sources that i have linked

−7

hawkseye17 t1_j5rnfpa wrote

"World's biggest democracy"

Yet they do this?

0

coreywindom t1_j5rviiy wrote

It’s like a big button that says “Don’t touch”

3

bobby-mcshabi OP t1_j5tkt64 wrote

Cambridge analytica was a British political consulting firm that came to prominence through the Facebook–Cambridge Analytica data scandal

Which was responsible for stealing millions of peoples data for political ads

As for RT news: RT has regularly been described as a major propaganda outlet for the Russian government and its foreign policy.[2] Academics, fact-checkers, and news reporters (including some current and former RT reporters) have identified RT as a purveyor of disinformation[58] and conspiracy theories.[65] UK media regulator Ofcom has repeatedly found RT to have breached its rules on impartiality, including multiple instances in which RT broadcast "materially misleading" content.[72]

From wiki^

Banning a documentary about your role in riots is very suspicious. Its like saying to someone

“oh yeah, I didn’t kill 3 people 20 years and bury all of them beneath now police stations. “😐

2

Yelmel t1_j5urrhl wrote

Right, so the rationale is perfectly clear, thanks. Orwell's works are so impressive.

What I'm not clear on is if India used existing regulations to ban this. What other instrument can they use, like a decree? I'm unfamiliar with their regulatory framework.

−1

handelMyChopinLiszt_ t1_j6c9gj6 wrote

India has a lot of heavy censorship, especially when the media involves information about the current ruling party BJP. They’ve even arrested people for simply criticizing the government. The Hindus are also getting more and more violent towards the minorities since they have the indian government backing them. I’m glad I left india a year ago, hope to never return there ever again. I just wish my family could join me in getting out of there.

1