567Antonio

567Antonio t1_j47ff92 wrote

Raw data set they used is right here from the government - https://bjs.ojp.gov/library/publications/criminal-victimization-2018 with over 180,000 violent attacks on Asians on record.

It doesn't matter who published it, the fact of the matter is the data shows blacks are 300% more likely to commit violent crimes against Asians.

> It's amazingly convenient that an article will say Black people make up 25% of incidents

It's 27.5% actually. And since we're talking about hate crimes, it excludes asian on asian violence.

Why are you trying to hide hate crimes. You're exactly the same as white trumpers who claim racism doesn't exist.

Dr Martin Luther King Jr said ""Our lives begin to end the day we become silent about things that matter."

Just because the data discomforts you doesn't mean you should hide it. He'd be ashamed of you right now.

4

567Antonio t1_j43pexo wrote

> after you've posted the same thing six times in this thread

Because racists in this thread are trying to hide the numbers and blame whites. If people like you would stop hiding the truth, I can stop posting.

> when people called out the numbers.

Where did people point out the numbers?

> the majority of people who have harassed Asians have been white people

Because whites are 75% of the population. But on a per capita basis, blacks are 300% more likely to commit violent crimes against asians.

The raw data set dating from 2018 is right there.

Feel free to refute instead of throwing unproductive, subjective tantrums.

2

567Antonio t1_j4370yk wrote

Because one race IS significantly more likely to commit racist crimes against asians, whether you like it or not.

Here's the data - https://www.city-journal.org/anti-asian-violence-separating-truth-from-narrative

> The data indicate just how misleading the narrative of white-on-Asian violence really is. While black perpetrators account for 27.5 percent of violent attacks against Asians, Asians commit less than 0.1 percent of violent attacks against blacks, indicating little role for proximity. Most violent attacks against individuals of a particular racial group are committed by other members of that group—except for Asians, where a plurality is committed by blacks. In fact, blacks are responsible for 305 percent more violent crime against Asians than neighborhood demographics would predict, while whites and Hispanics commit significantly fewer attacks against Asians than would be expected.

0

567Antonio t1_j432rh1 wrote

> Except that you’re wrong and the vast majority of anti Asian acts nationwide is committed by white Americans.

On per capita basis, blacks are more than 300% likely to commit hate crimes against Asians, despite you trying to hide that fact.

And of course, here's the data again that you conveniently ignore - https://www.city-journal.org/anti-asian-violence-separating-truth-from-narrative

Let's see how you try to spin and hide facts, since you people don't think of Asians as worthy of being defended.

> The data indicate just how misleading the narrative of white-on-Asian violence really is. While black perpetrators account for 27.5 percent of violent attacks against Asians, Asians commit less than 0.1 percent of violent attacks against blacks, indicating little role for proximity. Most violent attacks against individuals of a particular racial group are committed by other members of that group—except for Asians, where a plurality is committed by blacks. In fact, blacks are responsible for 305 percent more violent crime against Asians than neighborhood demographics would predict, while whites and Hispanics commit significantly fewer attacks against Asians than would be expected.

8

567Antonio t1_j431ml2 wrote

And of course, here's the data again that you conveniently ignore - https://www.city-journal.org/anti-asian-violence-separating-truth-from-narrative

Let's see how you try to spin and hide facts, since you people don't think of Asians as worthy of being defended.

> The data indicate just how misleading the narrative of white-on-Asian violence really is. While black perpetrators account for 27.5 percent of violent attacks against Asians, Asians commit less than 0.1 percent of violent attacks against blacks, indicating little role for proximity. Most violent attacks against individuals of a particular racial group are committed by other members of that group—except for Asians, where a plurality is committed by blacks. In fact, blacks are responsible for 305 percent more violent crime against Asians than neighborhood demographics would predict, while whites and Hispanics commit significantly fewer attacks against Asians than would be expected.

4

567Antonio t1_j431c2u wrote

Here's probably why - https://www.city-journal.org/anti-asian-violence-separating-truth-from-narrative

> The data indicate just how misleading the narrative of white-on-Asian violence really is. While black perpetrators account for 27.5 percent of violent attacks against Asians, Asians commit less than 0.1 percent of violent attacks against blacks, indicating little role for proximity. Most violent attacks against individuals of a particular racial group are committed by other members of that group—except for Asians, where a plurality is committed by blacks. In fact, blacks are responsible for 305 percent more violent crime against Asians than neighborhood demographics would predict, while whites and Hispanics commit significantly fewer attacks against Asians than would be expected.

5

567Antonio t1_j430zdc wrote

Here's the data - https://www.city-journal.org/anti-asian-violence-separating-truth-from-narrative

Let's see how you try to spin and hide facts, since you people don't think of Asians as worthy of being defended.

> The data indicate just how misleading the narrative of white-on-Asian violence really is. While black perpetrators account for 27.5 percent of violent attacks against Asians, Asians commit less than 0.1 percent of violent attacks against blacks, indicating little role for proximity. Most violent attacks against individuals of a particular racial group are committed by other members of that group—except for Asians, where a plurality is committed by blacks. In fact, blacks are responsible for 305 percent more violent crime against Asians than neighborhood demographics would predict, while whites and Hispanics commit significantly fewer attacks against Asians than would be expected.

4

567Antonio t1_j415qma wrote

Pointing out that violent racist crime is disappropriately done by one race relative to their population is facts, not racism.

Which means relative to other races in New York, they have more racists, and therefore are more racist per capita, which is another fact and simple statistics. Just like we can say Trumpers are racist too.

Feel free to point out anything wrong.

8

567Antonio t1_j412vu9 wrote

Because one race IS significantly more to commit racist crimes against asians, whether you like it or not.

Here's the data - https://www.city-journal.org/anti-asian-violence-separating-truth-from-narrative

Let's see how you try to spin and hide facts, since you people don't think of Asians as worthy of being defended.

> The data indicate just how misleading the narrative of white-on-Asian violence really is. While black perpetrators account for 27.5 percent of violent attacks against Asians, Asians commit less than 0.1 percent of violent attacks against blacks, indicating little role for proximity. Most violent attacks against individuals of a particular racial group are committed by other members of that group—except for Asians, where a plurality is committed by blacks. In fact, blacks are responsible for 305 percent more violent crime against Asians than neighborhood demographics would predict, while whites and Hispanics commit significantly fewer attacks against Asians than would be expected.

16