It was a very good podcast, that was about as fair and balanced as you can get (no agenda on either side). And they presented some real smoking gun evidence from both sides that was not widely reported (or reported at all), which was really surprising. Even still, while I admit that I definitely leaned more towards him definitely being involved in some way; I still think there was enough reasonable doubt that he would be found not guilty (as someone else said, not guilty doesn't always equate to innocent).
90sportsfan t1_je4m7ru wrote
Reply to comment by kindaoveritbruh in Maryland’s second-highest court orders new hearing for Adnan Syed, reinstates conviction by Cody_in_Baltimore
It was a very good podcast, that was about as fair and balanced as you can get (no agenda on either side). And they presented some real smoking gun evidence from both sides that was not widely reported (or reported at all), which was really surprising. Even still, while I admit that I definitely leaned more towards him definitely being involved in some way; I still think there was enough reasonable doubt that he would be found not guilty (as someone else said, not guilty doesn't always equate to innocent).