AI_Enjoyer87

AI_Enjoyer87 t1_ixemn5d wrote

The growth imperative is a capitalist foundation. A company cannot survive it isn't growing even if it is profitable. The nature of competition ensures this. If the leaders of companies pursue idealistic roads they will die. Grow or die is capitalism. All companies have to grow and make money or they will lose market share and die.

6

AI_Enjoyer87 t1_ixcbstt wrote

It will definitely happen in the US even if it takes longer than Europe for example. Older generations aren't dumb. They don't want their children and their grandchildren out of money. If there are really no jobs they will vote for UBI like everyone else. Politicians who embrace these changes will be enormously popular (most of them already believe in the same ideology guiding the WEF and their preparation for the technological advancements that are inevitable). Those who don't currently support these developments will change their views according to what will get them elected or they will become politically irrelevant as these changes will effect everyone from left to right.

1

AI_Enjoyer87 t1_ixa318t wrote

The thing is we don't even need AGI. We just need extremely competent AI. Who knows consciousness might not be possible through computation. Transformative AI that can replace jobs and dramatically increase technological progress is literally right around the corner. When this exists society will be transformed very quickly.

7

AI_Enjoyer87 t1_ixa2irx wrote

Jobs probably won't be a thing in the long-term. Do whatever makes you happy and helps others in the meantime. Once a company can automate your labour for less it will do it. Hopefully we can have UBI and people can have enough money to buy what they need. Companies still need people to buy products even if labour can be cheaply automated.

7

AI_Enjoyer87 t1_ix97hol wrote

Proto-AGI next year. AGI 2025 - 2027. FDVR between 2026 -2028 (I think AGI will enable non invasive compelling BCI). Those are my predictions. I think automation will have dramatic implications from late next year and will only start having societal implications from 2024 onwards. Probably way off but still that's what I think as of now. Will probably have a different view in a couple months.

5

AI_Enjoyer87 t1_ix97dvq wrote

Proto-AGI next year. AGI 2025 - 2027. FDVR between 2026 -2028 (I think AGI will enable non invasive compelling BCI). Those are my predictions. I think automation will have dramatic implications from late next year and will only start having societal implications from 2024 onwards. Probably way off but still that's what I think as of now. Will probably have a different view in a couple months.

19

AI_Enjoyer87 t1_ix1xm0e wrote

Proto-AGI possibly. AI art perfected. AI video and 3D perfected (oh and music). Gato 2. Significant advances in robotics. Experiments with BCI'S being two way and connected to AI (in the lab). Hopefully major government and media attention as to what is going to happen in the coming years.

And a hundred things we aren't expecting! Hopefully it's a good year.

7

AI_Enjoyer87 t1_iwo2vsf wrote

This is awesome (I know it's been done before but produced images of very poor quality). Another step towards full dive vr is exciting no matter how many more steps to go. Hopefully we get extremely capable AI in the next year or two that can solve these problems lightening fast.

10

AI_Enjoyer87 t1_iwgcone wrote

Disagree with your timeline. Think we will have a form of proto-AGI in a year or two. Then literally everything else shortly after. Probably AGI by 2025 if we are lucky. As soon as we get proto-AGI we will probably get advanced BCI's and full dive vr. Once we get that I think the next 30 years will be condensed into the next 5 or so. Ik it's a bullish timeline but I believe we are at the knee curve of exponential growth.

27

AI_Enjoyer87 t1_iwchv85 wrote

Some people truly love their lives. Their lives have meaning. If you're speaking exclusively about yourself then fair enough. I understand your position though it is a nihilistic philosophy that probably isn't conducive to happiness or the potential for meaning. I feel like my interest in this emerging technology and its consequences are a form of religious surrogate in the face of nihilism. I think this is the case with a lot of people in this sub.

8