Can't say I'm too impressed with this article. Mostly just vague "what if we used magnets or vibrators or something?" with little to no science, and they seem to think that twelve plus two equals three. Their list for reasons to do so is fairly repetitive, and they only vaguely acknowledge the health risks without really mentioning the social problems with it, social problems which this comment section can never point out fast enough.
For my part, I'll just say that the required customizable sensory deprivation smart bed and neuromodulation for this to effectively condense 8 hours of sleep to 2 will most likely be out of reach for the working class, limiting its potential abuse to tech bro workaholics.
A_Vespertine t1_isi6xup wrote
Reply to Sleep Simulation: The Future of Sleep? by Defiant_Swann
Can't say I'm too impressed with this article. Mostly just vague "what if we used magnets or vibrators or something?" with little to no science, and they seem to think that twelve plus two equals three. Their list for reasons to do so is fairly repetitive, and they only vaguely acknowledge the health risks without really mentioning the social problems with it, social problems which this comment section can never point out fast enough.
For my part, I'll just say that the required customizable sensory deprivation smart bed and neuromodulation for this to effectively condense 8 hours of sleep to 2 will most likely be out of reach for the working class, limiting its potential abuse to tech bro workaholics.