AelfredRex

AelfredRex t1_irvnn0t wrote

"Highest stakes"... two parties with a death grip on power continuing to have a death grip on power no matter who wins.

As junior Senators, both would be immediately ushered into the presence of the Party leadership and told that they will vote the way they are told or else. I'm sure they've already be briefed on that discussion and have had to kiss the feet of the real masters of this country several times just to fund their campaigns.

1

AelfredRex t1_irl1w9k wrote

"Waaah, teacher didn't use my pronouns! He didn't validate my ego! Crucify him! Destroy his career! Ruin him financially! I deserve to be OBEYED!"

That's what you defend. You think you're being so moral but you have no problem destroying a person's life just to stroke your own ego. Who's the dick?

0

AelfredRex t1_irgv6ng wrote

Ever see that episode of the Twilight Zone where the traveler comes across a house held hostage by a six year old boy with god-like powers, who simply erases anyone from existence if they don't give him what he wants?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/It%27s_a_Good_Life_(The_Twilight_Zone)

That's the kind of tyranny these fools are advocating. Because they want to be the tyrants.

−1

AelfredRex t1_irfyof8 wrote

Ever consider the blatant narcissism involved in demanding that people stop using the English language as based on millenia of common consentual usage and change that usage overnight arbitrarily simply to satisfy their own personal whims, and any who do not go along with those whims must be punished as an example to terrorize others into compliance?

The word "tyrant" comes to mind. So does "brat".

−9