> backers of the new climate resolution hope other instruments, such as the Universal Declaration of Human Rights or the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea, could offer some pathways for enforcement. > > The UN resolution notably asks the ICJ to clarify the "Legal consequences" for states which "Have caused significant harm to the climate system and other parts of the environment."

UN backers of this appear to have forgotten the lessons from the league of nations. The point of the UN is it doesn't have any teeth.

Debt traps are greatly exaggerated. It's pretty close to a leftist conspiracy theory and isn't substantiated.

Superior weaponry and rational actors on both sides of the table. The latter is missing, at least on Russia's side. Well, they're also missing weaponry too...

We're still a few orders of magnitude away from having enough functional qubits. Further, quantum computers are only good at s few specific things, and they'll need fast supporting intermediaries to feed them at reasonable speeds.

Tldr; yes but actually no.

I still don't understand why everyone cares what Israel does. But geopolitics isn't my forte by any metric.