Yeah but I think our dna contemplates some scenarios we haven't encountered. Novelty comes out but like you say, its mostly inevitable and a product of freedom of thought combined with our consciouscness and ingenuity.

That's an inevitable feedback loop which would need to then be intervened by a human to stop. Machines need the opposite to transcend to ai, they need a proxy for ingenuity, creativity, near perfect data fidelity [perfect integration which we can achieve through unified code legislation], also a quotient to approximate oxytocin, to detect what is a native friendly bot and what is not.