There’s a fucking floating hand behind you and a fucking tye and dye Chaplin on the left….

Why am I always the last one knowing those things? Girls I’ve already told you to informe me in the « plan for world domination » snap group that we are all part of.

>Reeves praises and supports the huge leaps and achievements of gender equality for women, but argues a society that has half of its population thriving and the other half struggling is a broken and nonfunctional society

Wait, we are thriving?

So you search for ancient historical revisionist agenda?

I will be serious here: History is always written from the perspective of the time it is done. Also, sometimes it don’t ad up with what we thought and we must accept it, accept that we were wrong.

If you do search for history on a subject but made in, let’s said, the 80 you then don’t have something that is more accurate (even if it can be but not because of the time period) but that is just tainted by a different time and you have to understand the glasses the writer had on while reading it.

Here you begin by the postulate that « all history books now are revisionist » that’s a narrow view of that, very broad, subject. You want not to learn but to confort yourself in your own beliefs, it’s not how it is done.

I’ll advise you to seek books made by someone who’s not from the country the history book is about for they have an outsider perspective that is sometimes way better.

>i want something that doesn't have a political agenda behind it, i just want history as it was,

Ho darling, do I have some news for you about History books