ArmsForPeace84

ArmsForPeace84 t1_jeg3b0z wrote

Agreed. Turning a profit from air-launched rockets is impossible with launch prices having fallen so dramatically with the arrival of Falcon 9, in particular.

There might yet be a market for soft-ride orbital spaceplanes that launch like this, or even from a runway. As opposed to "mere" hypersonic airliners.

But I wouldn't bet any of my own money on seeing these emerge by even 2050.

1

ArmsForPeace84 t1_jefiwfr wrote

Well, they're each designed around very different payloads and capabilities. Very different risk profiles. With the space tourism side able to sell tickets FAR in advance due to facing little competition in the space tourism business, while the payload to orbit business is already competitive and growing more so.

The only benefit I saw in their even getting involved in orbital missions is to, if it worked and could turn a profit, help grow their experience with orbital flights in hopes of one day carrying passengers and not just satellites. Selling these costlier, but also far more enticing, excursions to future space tourists.

7

ArmsForPeace84 t1_j2cw2ep wrote

Overwhelming bipartisan support in the legislature, like almost completely unanimous. The support of the FTC and the White House. The concern trolling over "safety and security issues" by hardware giants completely dismantled and refuted by a damning FTC report on these claims.

And the crooked-ass governor just steps in and turns a vitally necessary pro-consumer bill into a piece of anti-consumer legislation with amendments and an introduction that may as well have been drafted by Apple's lawyers, and probably was.

Oh, and this Teflon Don at the top is protected by New York's lack of any recall process. Wonderful.

3

ArmsForPeace84 t1_iydalku wrote

Also, you can call up to cancel and get their retention save offer.

Don't need to elaborate. You're looking to cut costs. For all they know, you're about to head out the door and pick up a T-Mobile box or something. Or tether your phone for a while. Who knows?

Probably better, for everyone involved, than using a government assistance program. More of a discount, more flexibility, and it's the cable company giving up that discount, instead of it being subsidized.

1

ArmsForPeace84 t1_iy85s6y wrote

After that humiliating launch in Vegas, I suspect the only reason city officials are willing to give him the time of day is in case their town comes up a possible site for a battery factory, an assembly line, or even just a dealership in their struggling downtown where they'd like to see luxury brands set up shop.

Or in case he pulls an Amazon and buys a brick and mortar business.

1