Astaligorn
Astaligorn t1_jd93sbx wrote
Reply to [D] ICML 2023 Reviewer-Author Discussion by zy415
I had a difficult discussion on an NLP paper I submitted with a reviewer whose sole argument for rejecting the paper is, "you did not try your method in computer vision". (Even though it beats all baselines and SOTA in NLP, on a broader NLP benchmark than all previous works).
I hope the AC will step in and will not take this review into account :(
Astaligorn t1_j2wldg7 wrote
Reply to [D]There is still no discussion nor response under my ICLR submission after two months. What do you think I should do? by minogame
The same is happening to me. My supervisors just told me that it happens and that we can't do anything...
Astaligorn t1_jd9evse wrote
Reply to comment by StellaAthena in [D] ICML 2023 Reviewer-Author Discussion by zy415
That is pretty much my rebuttal, along with previous work in CV suggesting that it might not work as well because one the main hypothesis does not seem to hold in image.
​
But they decreased their grade because we did not provide experiment in CV :(