AustinPowers007
AustinPowers007 t1_jaeea6g wrote
Reply to comment by New-Sky8027 in Rolls Royce Holdings PLC recovery play, aiming for 7 figures by 2024. by New-Sky8027
still good average and congrats
AustinPowers007 t1_jaedaow wrote
Reply to comment by New-Sky8027 in Rolls Royce Holdings PLC recovery play, aiming for 7 figures by 2024. by New-Sky8027
problem isnt their opperations which look positioned in perfect place problem is with their debt and contract liabilityes which amount to huge sums and are kinda hard to dissect and compare it to FCF per year to know the amount of refinancing that will be needed until liabilityes are under control; this year they made huge FCF but in the end ended in negative cause liabilityes.
AustinPowers007 t1_jae7wzf wrote
might have some juice in there but damn its way too hard for my smooth brain to formulate an hypothesis on them, that annual financial report is a fucking nightmare to parse
Edit: a DD on them based on cash flow debt maturity and facilityes and explaining all those liabilityes with acronyms would be nice af else its a pass based on complexity
AustinPowers007 t1_jea8d6y wrote
Reply to Nano Dimension: worth a second look by Ok-Faithlessness7931
not sure how enthusiastic i am on ticker being in wsb, have been buying lately but stock has already a high% of retail holders, adding all the constant drama and bots shitting on ticker non stop and coming june vote, im scared retail will forget or have it difficult to vote depending on broker used and will lead to mentioned firms using it in their advantage to distribute the money and dismantle company
Edit: tbh i would win money in that case too but im scared about hedge funds taking control of board and start giving themselves advisory funds to drain liquidity before a lowball offer to dismantle it, not sure how legal it would be but seems they shady enough though