BaltimoreBombers

BaltimoreBombers t1_je2e6m4 wrote

The DNA on her shoe could literally be from anyone in the school who touched them, or from a gym locker, or transferred in any number of ways. It’s not like it was under her finger nails, or somewhere unexplainable. The prosecutorial notes that Mosby said referred to a second suspect actually referred to Adnan, as confirmed by the prosecutor who wrote them. There was literally nothing exculpatory in it, unless you’re a conspiracy theorist, which is why the Attorney General came out in disbelief that Mosby overturned the rulings of the highest Maryland courts who saw the evidence and upheld the conviction.

16

BaltimoreBombers t1_je1kqvq wrote

Mosby wanted to do it quickly to take attention away from her own federal indictment. It’s not the best way to do court proceedings. I would be more mad at her than the notion that a victim’s family gets to have a lawyer present when facing a convicted murderer before his release.

28

BaltimoreBombers t1_je1jp83 wrote

Let the family “dictate legal strategy”? Mosby called the brother in California and basically said “you know the guy the state has been assuring you for 24 years strangled your sister? I’m going to release him in a few days despite the protests of the Attorney General and original prosecutor. Better take off work & fly home immediately if you want to be heard.”

46

BaltimoreBombers t1_je1gycz wrote

Everyone who got the result they wanted last year didn’t seem to care much that Mosby snubbed the victim’s family, as she has countless times before. It was pretty obscene, considering those involved in the original arrest & prosecution dispute’s Mosby’s “findings” and still stand by the conviction.

70