Baprr
Baprr t1_jd28c8h wrote
Reply to comment by marcandreewolf in I asked GPT-4 to compile a timeline on when which human tasks (not jobs) have been/will be replaced by AI or robots, plus one sentence reasoning each - it runs from 1959 to 2033. In a second post it lists which tasks it assumes will NOT be replaced by 2050, and why. (Remember it's cut-off 2021.) by marcandreewolf
It's just wrong instead of lying then. I mean, if you can't trust it to write the very easy to look up history of automation - why would you believe it's predictions? This info is pretty much useless.
Baprr t1_jd1on7e wrote
Reply to I asked GPT-4 to compile a timeline on when which human tasks (not jobs) have been/will be replaced by AI or robots, plus one sentence reasoning each - it runs from 1959 to 2033. In a second post it lists which tasks it assumes will NOT be replaced by 2050, and why. (Remember it's cut-off 2021.) by marcandreewolf
The chatbot tends to lie. Have you checked the years for obvious bullshit?
For example, the first result on googling #1 is
>Samuel first wrote a checkers-playing program for the IBM 701 in 1952. His first learning program was completed in 1955 and was demonstrated on television in 1956
Where did 1959 come from?
Baprr t1_j85yuav wrote
Reply to If life can randomly appear in the oceans of earth, why can’t it also randomly appear in the oceans of titan? by governingLody
>Scientists need to think outside the box instead of thinking in a conformed way governed by rules and principles, basically, scientists are searching the wrong places.
Scientists are searching there too. You aren't the first to think of that. It's just hard to actually do that.
Baprr t1_jd2f3bj wrote
Reply to comment by alex20_202020 in I asked GPT-4 to compile a timeline on when which human tasks (not jobs) have been/will be replaced by AI or robots, plus one sentence reasoning each - it runs from 1959 to 2033. In a second post it lists which tasks it assumes will NOT be replaced by 2050, and why. (Remember it's cut-off 2021.) by marcandreewolf
Not really. If you read what people predicted in the past about 2023, you might believe that we already have colonies in space, fully autonomous self driving cars, and cure for cancer. You have to filter the output of the chatbot, or it's - well, not gibberish, but extremely suspect information. It doesn't check or provide sources.
This list might be used to look up current projects that are being developed, and with some effort be turned into maybe 20 points of exciting things to look forward to.
But right now it's low effort useless content.