Honestly it's gotten to the point where if I see something that "could" do something, I just substitute in "could not."

I try to stay positive but going by the rate of technological advancement that these articles each week claim, we should all be living in Moon colonies by now.

> The car recognizes that a crash is inevitable and it has 2 options. Option one leads to severe harm for the single driver of the car. And option 2 leads to severe harm of 2 bystanders.

And honestly, even if the "correct" answer is to allow one to die so that two may live, who will want to purchase a car that will sacrifice your life for strangers? I know that I wouldn't, even if I logically acknowledge that it may be the "right" decision, I still emotionally value my own life over those of strangers.

I'd do anything to lose weight except eat healthy and exercise.