I know, right? What were they smoking?

Oh.

Instructions unclear, stuck with globally recognisable monument.

Looks pretty authentic, Jesus even looks like his face is partially decomposing.

I think it's a legitimate question to ask.

You mentioned one aspect and implied that this aspect would be specific to black people, so I asked if the others would be too. If not, and the other aspects would apply to anyone, why not do a racism study specifically for black people and do an overall study for the other aspects?

Do they only apply to black people?

That one aspect, sure. What about the rest?

Then why not simply do the study on families in general, why racialize it?

Why only do the study on black families, then?

Unless you're suggesting black people are being falsely imprisoned en masse, I think it's a justified assumption.

Okay, so they're not really being impeded by the state there, since the state is incarcerating them because they're committing crimes. It's the decision to commit the crime that impeded them.

I know the numbers are higher, but that doesn't imply measures taken to lower the number of absent fathers would only work on black people, does it?

When you say "mass incarceration", are they being incarcerated for shits and giggles, or because they've chosen to do something to cause them to be incarcerated?

What does that have to do with the state impeding them? Are you suggesting the state shouldn't lock them up for choosing to commit crimes?

But there are also white fathers who are absent, to which the findings would be equally applicable, so why focus on black fathers?

>Black fathers have been specifically impeded by the State from doing so in the United States for centuries

Impeded from doing what, being fathers?

Why black fathers and not just fathers?

Well gee, ya think?

Only black parents?