BruhBorne69
BruhBorne69 t1_ivf6g5x wrote
Reply to comment by app4that in India's Top export destination per continent [OC] by ixaditya
> India wild scream if it was at war with Pakistan and the west was trading with them
India would be against that but not surprised. India has been at war with Pakistan about 4 times but the west is yet to stop trading with Pakistan, US even keeps arming them from time to time. Profit over morals ig that's how it works with everyone.
> This may not matter to some but India was the leader of the Non-Aligned Movement and pushed other nations to not become willing pawns or satellites of the superpowers.
Non alignment is exactly what India is doing right now, they are not siding with anyone in the conflict to come out of it with as less harm as possible.
BruhBorne69 t1_iv40jjn wrote
Reply to comment by johnslavt in Apple Adds a New iPhone 14 Supplier in India in Shift From China. by SUPRVLLAN
Are you serious? Do you even know the history of India and China? China claims literal Indian states as their own territory so no India will never side with China, if there is ever a cold war between China and US India will prefer to stay neutral.
BruhBorne69 t1_iuimghz wrote
Reply to comment by Ivanthegorilla in U.S. partnering with India to enable it play 'broader stabilising role' in Indo-Pacific: senior Pentagon official by Gopu_17
I mean India doesn't have a white population so yeah easy to turn a blind eye towards them.
BruhBorne69 t1_iuiea7s wrote
Reply to comment by Ivanthegorilla in U.S. partnering with India to enable it play 'broader stabilising role' in Indo-Pacific: senior Pentagon official by Gopu_17
> Maybe if china gives something cheap the world should turn a blind eye as they push further into india
The world should do something, it's immoral to do nothing and let innocents get hurt right but the world still won't do anything, China already gives you all the cheap things it is a manufacturing hub the west won't dare to sanction them same way as Russia. USA would care to an extent and give India weapons but only because China threatens their position as the top dog other than that India will have fend for itself as it has been doing for the past 75 years. Like it or not countries work in the intrest of their people not morals.
BruhBorne69 t1_iuiagwm wrote
Reply to comment by Ivanthegorilla in U.S. partnering with India to enable it play 'broader stabilising role' in Indo-Pacific: senior Pentagon official by Gopu_17
My god! Do you have any reading comprehension or are you just trolling. I never said I am supporting slavery, rape or genocide you are the one who's doing it
> why not just help china take over northern india since india wants to help russia?! seems like a good deal to me...
Again read your own comment mate
BruhBorne69 t1_iui9il4 wrote
Reply to comment by Ivanthegorilla in U.S. partnering with India to enable it play 'broader stabilising role' in Indo-Pacific: senior Pentagon official by Gopu_17
> if someone supports terrorism
That's literally every major world power in existence but let's not go there and just read your own comment again you are literally in favour of supporting terrorists take over northern India regardless of how much deaths and slavery it would lead to, way to be a hypocrite.
BruhBorne69 t1_iug7mf3 wrote
Reply to comment by Ivanthegorilla in U.S. partnering with India to enable it play 'broader stabilising role' in Indo-Pacific: senior Pentagon official by Gopu_17
So beacuse Indian government in your mind wants to help Russia you want to help China take over northern India in which the war and the occupation would kill more people than the entire population of Ukraine and affect hundreds of millions of lives.
The level of stupidity and hypocrisy is astonishing.
BruhBorne69 t1_ivf72o4 wrote
Reply to comment by DeKalbGardener in India's Top export destination per continent [OC] by ixaditya
Ok but that wasn't the point here.