Calm_Farmer_3061

Calm_Farmer_3061 t1_jeg7qpa wrote

You cannot tell if someone is physically impaired just by looking at them. There are plenty of disabilities that impair you physically that aren't visible to the outside eye. I agree with getting scooters parked out of the way so that wheelchairs have access, but I don't think making sweeping judgements about other people's ability status is at all appropriate or even accurate in this case.

2

Calm_Farmer_3061 t1_j9bia7h wrote

Planet Word is a super fun and interactive museum for all ages! It has games and photo opps and karaoke and all sorts of fascinating and engaging stuff. And for a bonus you can grab food downstairs at either Immigrant Food or Atrium Cafe and then eat in Franklin park across the street! They even have a little playground, fountain, plenty of greens spaces, and actually nice public restrooms easily accessible. Plus you're right next to the McPherson Square metro or plenty of buslines if you wanted to travel around the city some more.

1

Calm_Farmer_3061 t1_j3ob0n6 wrote

yes they always use disability as a "gotcha" point when it comes to advancing their own agendas of car convenience. If they actually listened to disabled voices they'd know that the priorities are greater public access, more accessible public transit, etc. rather than an "attack on parking spaces".

3

Calm_Farmer_3061 t1_ivzuo1u wrote

Do you really think that people who are obese do not deserve accessible seating? Since you asked you can scope out this article on inclusive and accessible rail design at https://railroads.dot.gov/sites/fra.dot.gov/files/2020-07/Inclusive%20and%20Universal%20Accessible%20Design%20Guidelines%20for%20Next%20Gen%20Passenger%20Rail-A.pdf . The ideal situation would be moveable arm rests, but forgoing arm rests when that's not possible makes the seat more accessible.

8