Its 2 hours from Seattle

Dogs arent allowed in national parks

You should stay in an area that grizzly lives. So, not here.

Who gives a shit? The ecology is just fine without them and they have thousands of miles of territory in North America already

That is not my argument. My argument is that we decided years ago that is in our region's best interest to not have grizzlies.

Sorry, your side lost.

The classic "revert nature to what it was before modern society" pipe dream

Just like grizzlies in WA state. Move to rural BC and have a field day

Grizzlies were driven out of the Western US for a reason. Putting them too close major population centers is a horrible idea. They have tons of territory in the Rockies, Canada, and Alaska in more remote places

LOL. Sorry I enjoy backpacking and dont want to worry about getting eaten alive, because a bear is feeding on a dead elk near the trail and views me as a threat.

Lets put the fucking grizzlies in your back yard?

You feel the same way I do. This is a dumb idea that will lead to dead people, dead bears, and has 0 benefit except for the funding to the researchers

No one can explain how it is ecologically important. How are the Cascades being negatively impacted by no grizzlies? California? There isnt a negative impact.

The bears have most of North America to wander around up in Canada.

Not redditors who never actually go outside. The same ones who think this actually makes sense.

This thread is full of some of the most ignorant people imaginable. Thanks for trying to educate them