Conscious_Heron_9133
Conscious_Heron_9133 t1_iz5ik8t wrote
Reply to comment by gdahl in [D] PyTorch 2.0 Announcement by joshadel
I did, yes, but I found the syntax counterintuitive. It is very python-like, but its syntax was conceived to not include types declarations in the first place, and only later adapted to do so.
When I say high level differentiable framework in a strongly typed language I imagine to take something that works already as stronlgy typed, and then adapt it to automatic differentiation and jit compilation -- but not the opposite.
I refer to an hypothetical language that is, for example, what C# is to the C++. Similar syntax, higher level.
Does that make sense?
Conscious_Heron_9133 t1_iyqf7a9 wrote
Reply to [D] PyTorch 2.0 Announcement by joshadel
Why going towards JAX ONLY. As a quick survey: am I the only one who wants a high level differentiable framework in a strongly typed language?
Conscious_Heron_9133 t1_iz5j6a8 wrote
Reply to comment by p-morais in [D] PyTorch 2.0 Announcement by joshadel
Lol, kind of the opposite -- I am not a fan of python syntax.
The rest? All except for low-level and non0garbage collected.
I mean... in case Santa were listening...