>prefer the Kremlin leave Iran alone and let them get the nuclear deal and into the world markets.

Man... you really are poorly informed. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_withdrawal_from_the_Joint_Comprehensive_Plan_of_Action

Sure, we can agree to disagree. But honestly, you seem to be poorly informed and quite biased on the matter of US meddling in the affairs of other countries.

>the West's efforts to open Iran

Including:

• Overthrow of a democratically elected government
• [Military support of an aggressor](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_support_for_Iraq_during_the_Iran%E2%80%93Iraq_War
• Destroying oil platforms
• Shooting down a civilian jetliner
• Sanctions and embargoes

>Why does the Kremlin not want Iran to make a trade deal and nuclear deal with the West?

Dunno...

>Here's the real test: If you had to choose between being allied/owned by Russia or allied with the West, which would you choose?

I choose "being allied with Russia". Now - are you going to respect my choice, or send in the CIA to destabilise my country?

>You should read about history all around the event.

You keep telling me what to do, but from your walls of text it is very clear that you don't have much of an idea of historical facts.

>...will not be fully clear. That is the goal of those that misinform...

Sums up your writings.

>You do know there were three coups in Iran in the 1900s? Russia did two and Britain/US did the other. Are those not important to you?

No, not in the context of this conversation.

>Why do you hate Persians and Iran having freedom

Why do you keep saying stupid stuff?

>Do you prefer Eastern style closed authoritarianism to Western style open systems?

Not sure what you actually mean, but it is just stupid to claim that Iran was "Western style open" after the US led coup against a democratically elected Iranian government.

Britain was in cahoots with the US and helped to orchestrate the 1953 coup that overthrew a democratically elected Iranian government. You should read the Wikipedia article, where the reasons behind the coup are quite clearly explained.

Actually... I’m starting to think that you are a silly troll.

No, I mean exactly what I said. The US f**ked up Iran’s nascent democracy. US were the baddies. That’s just facts. Confirmed by the CIA, actually.

>Do you like to ask questions?

Yes, it is a hobby of mine. Pity you don't like answering them.

> you are pushing for Kremlin interests and angles and not even knowing it

I don't really care whose interests are served by facts. Fact is, the US f**ked up a nascent Iranian democracy in 1953.

>You are silly thinking that the US was to blame for remnants of the Great Game. We just wanted to not allow another WW after WWII and Russia was pushing it in Iran.

You are making shit up. Are you Republican?

>To even compare Western liberalized democratic republics with open markets and elections to Eastern authoritarian one party mafia states with closed markets and pressurized people shows how propagandized you truly are.

>Putin rates your cartoon opinion of the CIA and your "doesn't look like anything to me" about the Kremlin past and present a 9/11. Putin rates 9/11 an 11/9.

Is this copypasta from your CIA bullshit handbook?

>you don't understand Kremlin goals or influence in your own country.

Tell me, fool, what do you think is my country?

>fed propaganda

TIL Wikipedia and NPR are "propaganda".

>Iran in 1953 had a choice

I think we already covered that.

Why are you apologizing for the evil shit that the US did in Iran?

And now you are just making stuff up.

>Iran had a choice in 1953

Yeah, and they made the WRONG CHOICE, right? Well, democracies do that sometimes, (see Trump, Brexit). Fortunately the CIA fixed everything.

https://www.npr.org/2019/01/31/690363402/how-the-cia-overthrew-irans-democracy-in-four-days

>Why are you spreading Kremlin propaganda?

In this case, you are spreading bullshit, and when I call you out on it you double down on your bullshit.

Dude, wtf are you on about? do you even read your own sources?

>Russia backed the Iranian Revolution in 1979 >Ever since 1979 Iranian Revolution Iran has been a client state of the Kremlin.

And from your Wikipedia link on Iran's foreign relations following the 1979 revolution:

"The Islamic Republic of Iran experienced difficult relations with some Western countries, especially the United States and the Eastern Bloc nations led by the Soviet Union."

Why are you spreading bullshit?

Wow, the pot calling the kettle black.

Here take a look at this: https://media.defense.gov/2017/Dec/29/2001861964/-1/-1/0/T_GRIFFITH_STRATEGIC_ATTACK.PDF

Abstract:

"The United States Air Force has long favored attacking electrical power systems. Electric power has been considered a critical target in every war since World War II, and will likely be nominated in the future. "

>Modern terrorism started in Iran in 1979, which the Soviets influenced as they did the revolution there

What an absolute pile of bullshit. How about you provide some backup for this moronic claim.

Also, you may want to read this: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1953_Iranian_coup_d%27%C3%A9tat