He went on the radio and bragged about his pro-life credentials after signing the law, so I think people are reacting to that as much as the actual law. The ban after 24 weeks is fairly reasonable imo, but bragging about signing the first ban in decades put a lot of people off.

Most of the time I see accusations of corruption here, it's completely baseless. Affiliations and funding are public and have to be reported in the publication. Big Whoever is not buying out associate professors at state schools to publish in low impact journals.

Being skeptical means reading the article and evaluating it's merits. People seem to think it means rejecting everything by default, then looking for reasons to justify the assumption.

They're not usually writing for a public audience either, which doesn't help.

Solid title though:

>Just another clickbait title: A corpus-driven investigation of negative attitudes toward science on Reddit

My favorite was the article about a recent uptick of strokes in young people. So many comments blaming the COVID vaccines but the data in the study was from 2018.

If you take a big dose and/or aren't a regular user, yes. That's how an ER doctor would write then on a chart at least. Generally none of it is life threatening, but if you have no idea why it's happening it could be pretty scary.

This is very good news! Badly needed support for mental healthcare.

The lowest is a flashback episode and as I understand it was only made because of a writer's strike. Since it wasn't planned I guess OP decided to look at the next worst as well.

Seriouslt, it's just Excel and a couple of conditional formatting rules. I make these all the time, never thought of them as beautiful before.

Also the part where the complainant went to the library looking for inappropriate books. She was there to start a fuss no matter what she found.

So now the guy behind the cuts is saying they don't have enough money for schools? I never thought leopards would eat MY face.

You glossed over the part where a county attorney can decide the school has to defend their "this is bull" argument in court. It's an unnecessary burden that doesn't need to be there.

Obvious potential abuses should be fixed before passing a law, not after. They can submit a revised version and I'll reconsider my position, but I'm not going to pin my hopes on politicians doing the right thing after they have what they want.

Andy Dufrense was a fictional character. It's fitting that you would use him as an argument for who this law would help.

Your post sounds like you think this bill is a good idea with some flaws. I hope I misread it, but your example of the possible upside is straight out of the fear mongering playbook. Hyperbole aside, what books are you worried about? Are there examples of schools in NH stocking inappropriate books? I haven't read anything, thus why I call it unfounded fear mongering.

If you find something objectionable in the school library, start with a conversation. We don't need a law to protect us from a made up scenario.

It provides a way for any parent to waste schools' time and resources by filing a bogus complaint and forcing the school to have a hearing. Spare us the pearl clutching about "they could read 50 shades of gray." That's about as real as students using litter boxes at school. Blatant unfounded fear mongering.

This bill is designed to hurt public education under the guise of parental rights.

Are you using a forestry tape? The units look too big for inches.

Reddit randomly votes up or down sometimes. Something about fooling bots.

The only intervention was they had to isolate the viruses in order to be sure that they were the cause of infections in the amoeba cultures. That's what they mean by reviving. They isolated it, infected cells, which then infected other cells.

Most viruses don't have to be isolated to become infectious, and some are pretty good at crossing species.

Defending or defunding?

The knives used to be up there with cheese, but leatherman has taken a lot of the multitool market recently.

After that is probably hot chocolate. I mean, we know that Swiss Miss probably wouldn't pass in Switzerland, but we see the name everywhere so it's subconscious.

When you "well akshully" for white supremacists, it makes you look like one. At least comes off as sympathetic.

I don't think you'd be able to see that. 33 minutes is 0.55 degrees.

They routinely collect personal information about their guests?

Thank you. Reddit seems to be 100% convinced of this, but no official has ever even hinted at it afaik. I'll admit it seems very plausible, but let's not rule out general ignorance.

The graph makes it look like they put more plastic in the oceans than they produce. Are they dumping trash for other countries?

Not one of, the largest. We have the third largest legislature in the world behind the UScongress and UK parliament.