Play death stranding for all your bathroom immersion needs

These tools have been commercially available for years. For sure, I wouldn’t depend on it for high level UN talks…but sure seems accurate enough. Hell I would never have passed accelerated French at college without ai powered tools and that was a decade ago!

https://azure.microsoft.com/en-us/products/cognitive-services/speech-translation/

If policy increases the capacity for more cars to be on the road, it will increase the amount of cars on the road.

Mo cars, mo problems.

Nyc and other cities are actively trying to limit the amount of congestion. 14th street in Manhattan (one of widest, most travelled) has been restricted to busses and bikes for the last couple years. Plus they’re congestion fees, tolls, etc to discourage cars. And more legislation* is on the way.

*with overwhelming support by the public

You could do it now if you had the $.

Purchase a cs-2 for about 10 million. https://www.cerebras.net/product-system/

License an established llm for ? millions

Purchase a Boston dynamics robot for 100-200k

Hire one phd and a few techs to help out for probably 2 million / yr

You’d also need a building with adequate cooling/infrastructure and lots o electricity. Both very pricey.

Most companies have been messing around with stuff for years. The only requirement for entry is $

https://jalopnik.com/san-francisco-wants-new-restrictions-on-cruise-waymo-1850050281

Just because you can move the goal post doesn’t necessarily guarantee an actual goal.

True...but that's not the central issue.

A copyright requires human authorship. Even if you could copyright a prompt (you can't), the generated output would not be.

Sure, they're the ongoing lawsuits against ai firms that use copyrighted works to generate their own product. Regardless of the side you wish to come out on top, there is a lot of merit to the suit.

Cs degree->summer internships in ai/ml fields->masters work->more innternships->graduate->full time work->meet a Palantir engineer at a NYC* ai conference->get them drunk->steal their secrets->profit!

*nyc is their hq

Do you mean publicly released tools that utilize llm’s? Well probably here tbh.

If you want to learn about internal tools/software/networks that haven’t been released…I’m not sure anyone could really be trusted to give accurate information. Ai firms are pretty secretive about such projects.

Just look at Palantir. An ai firm that’s been around for years. Predicted everything from natural disasters to terroirs attacks…but they stay under the radar. I’d wager few in this sub have any knowledge they exist and even fewer have knowledge about its inner workings.

Copyrights are automatically granted to the creator of the work. Registration provides an indexed record of your copyright so others can see it.

Using work generated by automated processes is a huge liability. Anyone can sue you and claim ownership.

Hack fraud creatives using this tech thinking they are getting away with something are going to have a very rude awakening when their clients/etc sue them.

True. But engineers have come up with some clever ways to get around it and still offer performance gains.

Quantum computing is for problems that don’t have a clear solution. Classical computing isn’t going anywhere even as we look far into the future.

Most people cannot afford the cost of advanced predictive ai so even if there was another major breakthrough it would still probably only be available to the most wealthy and powerful. Not individuals, more like governments and multi corporations.

Check out ai firms like Palantir that have been doing this kind of work for decades. Predicting natural disasters, wars, terroirs attacks, so on.

It’s not a poorly worded cover letter, but it’s a start, right?

That’s a good take. I think Google’s discipline is rooted in its size and prominence. There’s too much to lose. MS on the other hand wants to desperately be the king of the hill again.

Dig it. I have a similar background and have had conversations with interns at ai firms like Palantir that have been doing the shit you described for years. I agree. It’s too expensive to train ai’s for every specific use case. That’s what I meant by “general”.

I think the most fascinating part of this current trend is seeing the general populations reaction to these tools being publicly released. And that’s what’s at the heart of my question…if the tech is unreliable, expensive, and generally not scalable …why is MS doing this?

I mean obviously they are generating data on user interactions to retrain the model but I can’t imagine that being the silver bullet.

Google implemented plenty of ai tech in their search engine but nobody raises an eyebrow, but now all this? I’m rambling at this point but it’s just not adding up in my brain ¯_(ツ)_/¯

⭐️ Refreshing to see someone who knows their shit on this sub. Where do you see this tech going for general use cases? Everything I read tells me it just isn’t ready. What is MS’s endgame for implementing all this?

That’s the heart of the issue. This tech is tremendously expensive to run. Most end users are accustomed to technology being “unlimited”. If the bot predicts the chat is over, then it seems it will not make additional predictions. Totally not emergent behavior. It’s been scripted.

This tech is far too resource intensive to make it accessible to everyone. The companies releasing these tools have already started to limit queries, predictions, and parameters. And users are getting frustrated.

I really don’t know MS’s endgame here. They seem to be following a trend that has no real goal.

I think you’re driving at current lawsuits that could possibly be used as precedent in other future lawsuits. As far as I know, there is no serious conversion of “banning” any generative AI technology at the local, state, or federal level.

Current lawsuits brought by Getty, etc could possibly set copyright limitations and determine how profitable it would be to implement such tech in outputting media properties.

If corporations cannot completely own the AI generated output, what would be the point of investing millions (billions?) into this? It’s not like the majority of creatives are given the biggest piece of the pie.

Thanks for posting that.

Did it help with your search? In the time it took me to read the ChatGPT response I found via google that the SKX009 was discontinued and, while available to buy, is quite pricey on the used market. The other information is somewhat accurate (EE’s using chronographs lol) but the brand info would also be on the first page of a google search.

Also…c’mon! Moonwatches in ‘23!? ChatGPT needs some fashion lessons.

This is an interesting trend but I’m having trouble identifying general search queries that would benefit from services like ChatGPT.

Can someone provide some examples that are not about generating code snippets or people trying to plagiarize creative works?