DippyMagee555

DippyMagee555 t1_j90b6z0 wrote

>Large health systems (literally every one in the area) would not be able to function without their resident/fellow workforce.

This is the issue. The system can't function without those people hours the residents put in. It's not like they're sitting there picking their noses.

If you take that away, the whole system is in shambles. Some departments of hospitals had this happen when covid would spread amongst those residents. Now imagine that happening not just to departments, but to entire hospitals? It can't happen. The issue as far as I can tell is that more residents are needed to spread out those hours.

6

DippyMagee555 t1_j21a1pf wrote

I'm no drone enthusiast and that may show through here, but I don't get why there isn't an exception for major media outlets and just hold them responsible for any damages caused by a drone.

It's not like the average drone user has a helicopter in their back yard as an alternative. The rules shouldn't be the same because the noise/pollution of a helicopter is something that should be disincentivized. If a news organization can afford a helicopter, they can afford the insurance necessary to cover damages caused by their drones.

3

DippyMagee555 t1_iy8w80d wrote

Have it myself - it's good enough. No issues in city, but your signal will go in and out if you take any car trips. Best to download maps of wherever you're going beforehand.

I'm not entirely sure, but I think I read it has something to do with prioritization. It uses t-mobile towers, but when they're sparse the t-mobile customers get priority to the towers.

Feel free to send a message to me for a referral code, I believe if you sign up with one we both get a free month.

1