Reading comprehension isn't your strong suit, is it? He completed his service - he was a civilian, not armed or uniformed in any way. Not a combatant, and his teenage brother certainly wasn't either.

Ain't no double standard, you just don't give a shit about Israeli civilians.

Jews do not make 2% of the population. There are around 15 million Jews in the world, meaning about 0.2%.

It did not, not in the way you intend anyway. The region was controlled by the British Mandate at the time, and due to heavy Palestinian resistance to the idea of more Jews coming to the area, refugees included, the British enacted a series of immigration restrictions called the White Papers, which crippled the ability of Jews attempting to flee from Europe to get there. The Palestinians' policy has demonstrably got Jews killed.

See: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/White_Paper_of_1939

That's not how religion, culture or traditions work. That there wasn't a tree at the nativity scene doesn't mean a thing - the nativity scene didn't appear out of thin air when Christianity was formed either - it appeared centuries after.

The gifts, tree and all the rest are culturally Christian traditions, just like eating specific foods or giving Hanukkah money is Jewish cultural tradition. It cannot be divorced from it, and it is not some universal tradition with no background. It doesn't make it bad or anything, but it's important to acknowledge it for what it is.

That's nonsense. The Christmas tree is, well, a Christmas tree. Christmas, despite what some insist nowadays, remains powerfully Christian, as do all of its symbols, the tree included. That people suggest that it isn't just reinforces how powerful of a Christian normative mark US society has.

The Christmas tree, Santa Claus, all the rest of it - it's all Christian.

A question, if you don't mind - how would you react to a Christmas tree in the same place?

You may be confusing the Indian soldiers who participated in conquering the region from the Ottomans during WW1, thirty years before Israel's foundation. It was done on behalf of Britain rather than the Jewish community. It did indirectly allow for Israel's formation, I'll give you that.