https://youtu.be/ZvK-dxV7xxk

It's not vague, at all. That's just your opinion.

That's not vague at all. There's no need to discuss sexuality with prepubescent elementary schoolers.

You don't go on Tiktok much, do you?

Well, if it's nobody the law shouldn't effect anything and there's nothing to complain about.

Yes, I have two. I also know that as an adult, you're supposed to sometimes say, "No." I also know as a former teacher, the job is to teach the subject, not go on a tangent about your sex life.

Why would acknowledging your spouse become a discussion? You can't have conversations about normal life without making it into an instruction or in-depth discussion about your sexual orientation? Because that's what the law prohibits, not wholesome anecdotes about your home-life.

What do you mean? Instruction already has a concrete definition: "detailed information about how something should be done or operated. Teaching; education."

The bill explicitly does not prohibit students from talking about their families or bar classroom discussions about LGBTQ history. The bill states that “classroom instruction by school personnel or third parties on sexual orientation or gender identity may not occur.”

Answering a question with a direct answer is not equivalent to having a classroom discussion or instruction about the subject.

Classroom discussions or instruction. Mentioning your spouse isn't the same as instructing them on what being gay is.

You don't need a lesson about why some women want to wear pants.

That's not true. The law bans curriculum or classroom instruction about sexual orientation, not answering basic questions.

They just can't go into full teacher-mode about what it means or what it entails. They don't need worksheets about why Susie wants to be with Sally. The law makes it so that they have to stick to academics.

No.