The predictions seem to lag actual by half a year to a year. Good to know.

When the news reports say "analysts predict", I know how to value that information.

"Associated with a slightly increased likelihood of natural delivery."

Also worth clarifying that Kalmar was close to the Danish border at that time. It was nowhere near the Nothern passage that was the nominal object of the dispute.

Between that an MDPI, you have to start by examining the methods if you feel moved to read it at all.

The coalition is composed of people who want to zip around Lake Powell (a reservoir) in their boats, and the snow is not melting down there fast enough for them.

No beets were harmed in this study.

Students (or their parents) with a GPA over 4.0 may think that is evidence that they are better than perfect. But faculty who grew up when 4.0 was the max see that and think their GPA must be completely bogus. So it can backfire.

The specific scenario modeled here should not play out very much. If your income is that low, the financial aid package will be more generous. The exception is for-profit schools that were established to fleece the poor out of all the money they have and all the money they are able to borrow on student loans.

Is the goat meat halal?

Could the original red have faded, and this was a refresh? That possibility doesn't seem to be excluded by the data.

A crucial point is that these maps were not worth much money at the time the red ink was applied. It is not comparable to doing do in today's market in which the documents sell for a great deal.

You mean that one of the authors visited Harvard and put that address in their contact info also? That is not a good way to judge the credibility.

This pub is from MDPI, the world's leading purveyor of junk science.

The conclusion may be true, but this is not the review paper I would trust.

The warning is important. MDPI is letting lots of crap through. I don't trust anything in their journals any more.

From a visualization standpoint, it would be stronger to illustrate a gap with a visual gap. could you lay out the graphs so the image and the metaphor match?

One of the requirements for making a data presentation beautiful is that it clearly answers the question being asked. This graphic clearly fails to do so.

Since OP does not have the data to answer that question, it would be appropriate to change the question and headline to align with what can be done.

A major weakness of the analysis is limiting it to domesticated fowl and mammals. Commerical fish and shellfish provide meat as well. But the most individual animals eaten by people are insects and some other small invertebrates. Not knowingly, but those animals are heading down people's guts and need to be included in the answer to the OPs headline question.

Sankey charts become difficult to interpret when there are both positive and negative values. Is there a better way to present the gains and losses?

Ronaldo seems to think that the Glazers have been bleeding equity into their pockets the whole time.

If it were priced at a P:E of 20, they'll give you four million quid to take it off their hands. You should go for it.

Are the foreign laborers even considered people by the Qataris? Would they make the "population" graph differently?

A great example of the danger of extrapolating beyond your data. All the fit lines need to stop a the highest X value or less. That would remove the rearkmable line for Africa, which shoots up beyond Egypt into fictional wealthy polluted countries.