“You know she’s actually a really decent person, if we ignore that tiny genocide she supported. Also, there were fine people on both sides anyways, so case dismissed”, random redditors. 🤷‍♂️

She’s a Bamar nationalist, who thought removing Rohingya was part of nation building. At no point did she show remorse nor say anything against the genocide. She was not silent. She openly supported the military and justified it by referring to fear of muslims taking over. Even as late as December 2020, she didn’t allow the Rohingya to vote in the national election.

Links:

https://www.nytimes.com/2019/12/11/world/asia/aung-san-suu-kyi-rohingya-myanmar-genocide-hague.html

Here is her saying there were fine people on both sides:

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-42824778.amp

Here’s another:

https://www.vox.com/platform/amp/2016/3/28/11306856/aung-san-suu-kyi-muslim-rohingya-bbc

https://time.com/5910739/myanmar-election-rohingya/

At The Hague? Didn’t seem like it. She also took issue when a Pakistani “Muslim” was interviewing her. There’s no way to revise the fact that she was complicit, and the Burmese who are now asking for help, were actively supporting the genocide.

Link:

https://www.vox.com/platform/amp/2016/3/28/11306856/aung-san-suu-kyi-muslim-rohingya-bbc

She defended the military at the Hague.

Seems like a lot of angry Burmese downvoting since they are not happy with the truth.

Here’s a bit of truth: https://amp.theguardian.com/world/2019/dec/10/aung-san-suu-kyi-court-hague-genocide-hearing-myanmar-rohingya